← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

“It’s almost spooky trying to address a room of people who[se] eyes are downcast and blank and who are zoned right out of their minds on addictive devices. The distracted users often have no sense whatsoever that they’re in a shared public space — they play loud games, huddle together in small groups to laugh at who knows what on the screen as though they’re alone, ask me to repeat information I just gave in a loud, clear voice because even though we were only metres apart at the time they were in dreamland…”

Well, we know all of this, and the only contribution the Canadian professor I’m quoting makes is a literary one: He puts a nice Edgar Allan Poe twist on the sheer creepiness of teaching to a laptop.

Creepier still is the way, sufficiently massed and sufficiently angry (think five hundred laptoppers herded together for PowerPoints and clicker tests), these students begin to stage a Revenge of the Zombies. The professor, for instance, is commenting on an article about an engineering class at Ryerson University:

Paper airplanes thrown at professors, music and movies played aloud on laptops and chattering cell phone users are causing engineering instructors to pack up and leave.

In an announcement posted on BlackBoard Oct. 19, first-year engineering instructors Robert Gossage and Andrew McWilliams announced two measures to deal with the “constant disruptions” in General Chemistry lectures.

The first was a three-strike policy. After three warnings the professor would walk out and it would be up to students to learn the rest of the lecture material on their own. The second was to make test and exam questions harder, since “the class appeared to know the material well enough so as not to listen during lecture.”

“Chemistry has been the worst,” said Adam Rupani, a first-year engineering student. “I was sitting in the first row and couldn’t hear the professor.”

Oh, but there’s some good news!

Rupani said lectures have been better since the removal of clicker tests that were at the end of each lecture. Students got bonus marks just for taking the test, but without it, some of the rowdier students decided to skip class.

“People won’t come if there’s nothing going on,” said Rupani.

Truly the introduction of enormous classes, PowerPoint, laptops, and clickers has been a boon.

To journalism. And to YouTube.

Margaret Soltan, November 26, 2010 6:50AM
Posted in: technolust

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=27683

2 Responses to ““It’s almost spooky trying to address a room of people who[se] eyes are downcast and blank and who are zoned right out of their minds on addictive devices. The distracted users often have no sense whatsoever that they’re in a shared public space — they play loud games, huddle together in small groups to laugh at who knows what on the screen as though they’re alone, ask me to repeat information I just gave in a loud, clear voice because even though we were only metres apart at the time they were in dreamland…””

  1. david foster Says:

    Shortly after the introduction of the telegraph, a journalist remarked: “This extraordinary discovery leaves…no elsewhere…it is all here.”

    (The Internet is, of course, a direct descendant of the telegraph.)

    Perhaps if there’s no *elsewhere*, there’s also no *here*???

  2. Old School Says:

    From the Maclean’s page:

    University Diaries: In my personal experience, the digital distractions weren’t this bad even a semester or two ago. While this has been a creeping phenomenon, this semester’s antics are sudden, unprecedented, and surreal. I’ve taught in Canada and the U.S., and can report that until rather recently Canadian students were generally, well, truth be told, a little better behaved. (Sore-ry, my American cousins.) Well, no more. Poof goes the myth of Canadian politeness. We’re all in the same leaking boat now.

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories