← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

An attempt to find nice things to say about for-profit colleges…

…generates scathing responses from readers.

********************************

And speaking of scathing: The author links to a recent study of online education. Excerpts:

Students in the online courses were significantly better prepared at the outset … [H]owever, students in the online course performed more poorly than those in the face to face course…. Students who took developmental math and English courses online were much less likely to subsequently succeed in college level math and English. … [C]olleges that are focused on improving student success should proceed cautiously in expanding online course offerings.

The study’s author, Shanna Smith Jaggars, notes the pathetic lost-in-cyberspace nature of the online experience. One student says: “I didn’t feel like there was an instructor presence… I didn’t feel like there was anything I was learning from the instructor. The instructor was simply there as a Web administrator or as a grader.”
(Longtime readers know that UD calls online professors air traffic controllers.) Other student comments: “[I was] sort of on this island, all by myself.” “Alone and adrift.” “I know nothing about these people!”

Online would be a great way to study Samuel Beckett’s plays. It allows you to feel his theme.

Oh, and:

Online communication can be easily misinterpreted, due in part to the lack of visual and facial cues. Online teachers are encouraged to provide timely and detailed feedback. However … they often do not have any information about how the student responds to this feedback. In fact, students may misinterpret a high level of feedback as negative feedback when in reality a teacher is merely posing questions to stimulate student thinking.

Yeah funny thing about that. Online interaction ain’t really interaction, is it? Interaction means back and forth, doesn’t it?

Since a number of studies show these results, one researcher concludes that, for instance, “[t]eaching economics courses online in community colleges is probably not good policy.”

Here’s what the NYT columnist should have said in defense of online education, for-profit or not for profit. It’s really cheap.

Margaret Soltan, February 25, 2011 12:24PM
Posted in: CLICK-THRU U.

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=29423

One Response to “An attempt to find nice things to say about for-profit colleges…”

  1. Is it possible to teach an online history course that isn’t evil? « More or Less Bunk Says:

    […] If you’d like to see a good summary of the always evil position, UD has one of the best I’ve ever seen up today. It’s going to be hard to make me feel better about what’s going to be done […]

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories