← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

Here’s a remarkable point/counterpoint on university football from the Huntington Herald-Dispatch…

… a West Virginia newspaper.

It begins with a July 6 letter from good ol’ Wade Gilley, president of Marshall University (background on Marshall here) in the ‘nineties. Wade went on to head the University of Tennessee but had to leave onaccounta he did a few things that seem like they didn’t sit well with other people there. Yeah, ol’ Wade had to scoot.

Now Wade’s letter is a model of its type. What you got here is the good ol’ boy reminiscing bout the good ol’ days when men was men and Marshall was a beautiful paradise of football, football, and football.

I … remember being invited to a national meeting of 20 university presidents and 20 Fortune 500 corporate CEOS in the late 1990s and hearing many positive remarks about Marshall. In fact, Father Malloy, the president of Notre Dame at that time, approached me at a reception and said, “Wade, some of us were just talking about the success of your football program and we were wondering just how it happened.”

And that’s just one story about rich important people flocking around me wanting to know my secret of success!

After sharing more stories about how fantastic football is for universities, Wade concludes:

And there is no doubt that football, which is largely self-supporting, has been and will be a positive factor in promoting Marshall’s national image.

A little nay-saying (“Self-supporting? Hardly.”) does pop up among the commenters, but a July 13 opinion piece from a Marshall finance professor really puts the kibosh on the thing. Dallas Brozik is a hard-nosed guy and he ain’t having any of it.

Despite the fact that one of his students, on Rate My Professors, says Dallas doesn’t like English majors, Dallas writes really well. Let’s see how he does it, step by step. Scathing Online Schoolmarm will interrupt his piece with comments in parenthesis.

 

 

*****************************

 

Wade Gilley’s recent letter concerning the ongoing discussion about the Marshall University budget was quite interesting. [Now usually SOS complains about the profoundly uninteresting word interesting. But Dallas here’s going to use it slyly, in the manner of Oscar Wilde…] Just as a magician uses sleight of hand to mislead the audience, those who wish to keep the university budget a black hole keep spreading misinformation.

I have no doubt [Brozik will repeat the formulation I have no doubt throughout his piece.]   that Dr. Gilley met with folks at all levels who commented on our football team, which at the time had a winning record. Sports always makes good small talk. I have no doubt that we had the best athletes and coaches despite the legal and criminal records of some of these individuals.  [Note how slyly Brozik has already gotten two points across:  Gilley’s a maundering fool; and the teams he’s teary-eyed about were pretty smelly.]

I have no doubt that Dr. Gilley met a person whose daughter had chosen to go to law school at a certain university, supposedly because of the school’s athletic program. I also have no doubt that I would not want this person to represent me in a court of law unless it is about sports law.  [Brozik’s calm, reiterated I have no doubt is wonderful.  It signals a kind of elaborate emotional self-control, a determination to be gentlemanly and long-suffering about Gilley.]

Dr. Gilley has no doubt that the football program has been an important factor in the increase in enrollment at Marshall. Dr. Stephen Kopp became president on July 1, 2005. For the academic year 2005-2006, the official enrollment of the university was 13,920. The official enrollment for 2012-2013 was 13,708. This implies that the football program, or whatever, created negative enrollment growth.  [Oh, don’t confuse me with numbers!  And that or whatever is wonderful too  – another sly polite little suggestion that Wade is somewhat whacked out.]

Dr. Gilley has no doubt that the football program has been a very positive economic growth factor for Huntington. Since Dr. Gilley’s time, the population of Huntington has decreased and many businesses have closed. The 2012 State of Well-Being Report from Gallup-Healthways ranks Huntington as 188 out of 189. Check the want ads section of today’s paper to see how many job openings exist and at what levels. There has been no economic miracle in Huntington over the last several decades, football or not. [You can see ol’ Wade putting a hand over each ear at this point and saying LALALALALA I can’t hear you I can’t hear you…]

Wade Gilley left Marshall under his own cloud [We won’t even go into his University of Tennessee cloud.]; why he wants to get involved in this discussion is strange. He has no dog in this fight. He is old news. He admits he has little insight into the current budget situation, but he has no doubt that a football program which is not self-supporting promotes Marshall’s national image. Dr. Gilley is entitled to his opinion, but opinions are like bellybuttons; everybody has one but very few should be aired in public.  [SOS would drop the way down-home belly button thing.  Brozik doesn’t need it; and it breaks his terrific tone of restrained contempt.]

Dr. Kopp promised “transparency” in April.  [Only in his last paragraph does Brozik turn to Marshall’s current football-concussed president.  Nice move.  It puts MU’s latest loser squarely in the company of Gilley.]  He still has not opened the books for review, even though state law requires him to do so. The current problem is one of accountability for state funds and the tuition and fees paid by students. Those who try to frame this as an anti-sports question are either misled or trying to be misleading. The budget for Marshall University is important to the entire community, and that budget should be examined. The time for opinions is over. It is time for action. It is time for Dr. Kopp to live up to his promise of transparency and open the books.

Margaret Soltan, July 13, 2013 9:02AM
Posted in: Scathing Online Schoolmarm, sport

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=40500

4 Responses to “Here’s a remarkable point/counterpoint on university football from the Huntington Herald-Dispatch…”

  1. Jack/OH Says:

    Thanks, Prof. Brozik and UD. ” . . . [P]opulation of Huntington has decreased and many businesses have closed.” Ka-ching! The secret question many higher ed-friendly folks ask themselves, because they’re too afraid to ask it aloud, is, “What does our beloved Podunk State actually do?”

  2. charlie Says:

    What does your beloved Podunk State do??? Well, Podunk or not, it generates huge profits for the heavy political lobbying contractors, who build the recreation centers, luxury dorms, administrative buildings, which house all of the functionaries with ponderous job titles, as well as Wall Street investment houses, who market, and invest, in the public bonds needed to fund the academic Potemkin Village.

    The Podunk States are absolutely necessary to keep the scam going, due to the fact that most universities fall into that category. In order to escape that level of hell, the schools need to spend, spend, spend, so as to longer be Podunk State. Unfortunately, if you’re a donut, no amount of marketing is going to make you a wedding cake, and no amount of spending is going to make PSU into anything but. But it sure makes it worthwhile for the connected….

  3. Jack/OH Says:

    Charlie, yeah, thanks, you’re right. FWIW-what’d happen in my area if a handful of profs issued a statement, “We object to our specialized skills being used as cover for a whole lot of shenanigans that detract from teaching and learning”? They’d probably garner instant street credibility here. The mistrust of our local Podunk States is that widespread. (As a non-prof, I have no clue how you’d put together a statement like that without major blowback.)

  4. charlie Says:

    “We object to our specialized skills being used as cover for a whole lot of shenanigans that detract from teaching and learning.” Well, tenured professors are suppose to be the ones who should issue that statement, that’s why they’re given tenure. They are suppose to be the academic conscious, in fact, they’re suppose to be the national one as well. Tenure ain’t given so as to have a job for life, but to make allow the best and brightest to demand answers and thorn in the side of corrupt institutions and functionaries. The fact that such a statement hasn’t been made underscores the corruption of many Faculty Senates. They have failed, and imo, their tenure should be taken away, and abolished, if they don’t do what required to get that sinecure….

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories