← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

Richard Cherwitz is not the first university specialist in communication who communicates poorly…

…and he won’t be the last. But he is certainly one of the first professors to complain that the “final straw” (one of his cascade of cliches) in the matter of American university big-time sports is the doubling of prices for faculty tickets. Not the crime, not the slime, not the one-and-done time, not the president-as-athletic-department-mime (gimme a break – trying to keep up the … rhyme…) — no, the ugly rot at the core of campus football and basketball turns out to be his university having “more than doubled the price of faculty and staff season … tickets.”

In setting out his critique of university sports at places like his school, the notorious University of Texas, Cherwitz offers the classic bad writer’s combination of pretentiousness and – as we already noted – cliche. Oh – plus pointless quotation marks.

I cannot speak to what may be the legitimate concerns and response of donors. However, I know that most of my faculty and staff colleagues with whom I have talked opted not to renew their season tickets. It now was clear to us that the Athletics Department no longer considers faculty and staff to be members of the “family” and “community” – the very people who educate and serve student athletes. Instead, we became another one of the institution’s many “corporate customers.”

Scathing Online Schoolmarm trusts that given his love of sports, Cherwitz’s boycott will be of short duration. She’s sure that will be true of other faculty members as well.

*****************

UD thanks a reader for sending her the opinion piece.

Margaret Soltan, July 9, 2015 9:00AM
Posted in: Scathing Online Schoolmarm, sport

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=48999

One Response to “Richard Cherwitz is not the first university specialist in communication who communicates poorly…”

  1. Mr Punch Says:

    Quotation marks for “family” and “community” probably appropriate, I’d think, if these words were formerly used by athletic department; in “corporate customers” may be actual quotation or attempted parallelism, but certainly weaken writing.

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories