Hoo whee.  Now we’re getting somewhere.  Why are these salespeople professors?

The Wall Street Journal, focusing on the latest sordid conflict of interest (UD thanks a reader for forwarding a related article about the professor in question.), quotes the head of the Association for Medical Ethics, and he says what needs to be said.

An excerpt, and a handy chart, from the Wall Street Journal:

“A prominent spine surgeon and researcher at the University of Wisconsin received $19 million in payment over five years from Medtronic Inc., one of the country’s largest makers of spinal devices, according to a senator who is investigating potential conflicts of interest in medicine.

[thomas zdeblick]

The surgeon, Thomas Zdeblick, received the payments while helping Medtronic develop and promote a number of spinal products. Medtronic’s $19 million in payments to Dr. Zdeblick from 2003 to 2007 went “greatly” beyond what was evident in disclosures he made to the university, Sen. Charles Grassley said in a Jan. 12 letter to Kevin P. Reilly, the school’s president. The University of Wisconsin, like other academic centers that conduct federal research, is required by the government to monitor its researchers’ financial conflicts.

In each of the five years cited in the letter, Dr. Zdeblick told the university that he received $20,000 or more from Medtronic, and in one year, he reported getting $40,000 or more. The disclosures conform to school policies, which currently don’t require researchers to specify amounts received above $20,000.

The report of multimillion-dollar payments to Dr. Zdeblick comes amid a growing movement for more detailed disclosure of the financial ties between doctors and outside interests. Most public disclosures of relationships between doctors and companies rarely specify how much a physician is being paid. When amounts are disclosed, they are often revealed in a fashion similar to that of Wisconsin’s policy in which a threshold amount is used, such as a doctor earning more than $10,000, with no other details reported.

Sen. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, told Mr. Reilly that “more than $20,000″ in this case meant far more — from $2.6 million to $4.6 million in royalty and consulting payments per year — according to Medtronic records…”

*************************************
The Wisconsin Journal-Sentinel has some questions.  But nobody’s around!

One unanswered question is how Zdeblick could work as a full-time employee of the university and develop inventions with royalties in which the university did not share. Often, such payments go through the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.

A spokesman for [the university's president said the president] did not want to comment and referred a reporter to officials with the Madison campus.

Robert Golden, dean of the medical school, was not available for comment. Jeffrey Grossman, president and chief executive officer of the UW Medical Foundation, also was not available for comment.

None of this would have come out if it weren’t for lawsuits.

In some lawsuits, Medtronic has been accused by former employees and the government of inducing surgeons to use its spine products with payments for sham consulting agreements and lavish travel. In 2006, Medtronic agreed to pay $40 million to the government to settle civil allegations that it paid kickbacks to doctors, including sham consulting and sham royalty agreements as well as lavish trips. Those allegations were initially made in two lawsuits brought by former Medtronic employees, including a former legal counsel. As part of the settlement, the employee lawsuits were dismissed. While agreeing to the settlement, Medtronic denied any wrongdoing.

In one of the lawsuits settled by the government’s agreement, a former Medtronic employee said Dr. Zdeblick received a “sham” 10-year consulting contract with Medtronic. A copy of the contract shows that he agreed to do two days of work per quarter over 10 years for $400,000 a year…

Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=8069

6 Responses to ““The ethics association headed by Dr. Rosen, which includes spine surgeons and academics, is also advocating the position that any doctor making more than $50,000 from device or drug companies should not hold an academic appointment.””

  1. tzvee Says:

    minnesota’s medtronic are the masters of conflicts of interest. or should we just drop the pretension and say – corruption.

    keep after them. not that it will do any good……

  2. MikeM Says:

    And while we’re at it, how about requiring physicians to disclose kickbacks– oops, referral fees– received from hospitals where they send patients? Oh,… you didn’t know about that?

    Neither did I, until I served on a jury with a woman whose job at the hospital was to manage those payments. Her hospital paid some doctors thousands of dollars per week.

    And what about your physician’s investment in the limited partnership that owns the radiology equipment where she sent you for your MRI? Or the lab where she sent your blood work? Shouldn’t she report any relationships that might be interpreted as self-dealing?

    That’s right, put it ALL on the board. I want to be able to go to my physician’s web page and click on the link to the State Board of Licensing which discloses in a clear table all payments, gifts, gratuities and ownership interests that could conceivably create a conflict of interest.

  3. On Wisconsin’s "Talking Heads" — HealthFeedr Says:

    [...] by Sebastin on January 19, 2009 Last week, the metropolis Journal-Sentinel ran an inquiring information on conflicts of welfare moving power at the University of river scrutiny school, digit of the meliorate famous and more prestigious US land based institutions. (The digit important articles were “Doctors Face Pressure to Disclose All Side Pay,” and “Drug Firms Wine, Dine and Pay Up for Doctors’ Speeches.”) Several of our man bloggers hit discussed this superior information already, including Dr histrion Brody on the Hooked: Ethics, Medicine and Pharma blog, and Prof Margaret Soltan on the University Diaries blog. [...]

  4. taochiapet Says:

    the real scandal is how over-prescribed spine surgery is for back pain, and how poor the average outcome is (yes, there are plenty of success stories, but overall less than 50% of back surgeries are considered successful.

    so why so much money in it?

  5. Posts about UW Madison as of January 31, 2009 » MyMadison Says:

    [...] also trained his eye on UW, where federally mandated disclosure forms don’t require doctors “The ethics association headed by Dr. Rosen, which includes spine surgeons and academics, is also … – margaretsoltan.com 01/17/2009 Hoo whee.  Now we’re getting somewhere.  Why are these [...]

  6. University Diaries » The wild and crazy University of Wisconsin medical school… Says:

    [...] is at it again, giving the local newspaper such a runaround on their conflict of interest policy deliberations that the paper, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, has sued. The University of [...]

Comment on this Entry

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Latest UD blogs at IHE

Archives

Categories