This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Thursday, January 13, 2005

YALE: IGNORANT AND HYSTERICAL, BUT CORRECT


I. Ignorant: In a Yale Daily News article about a new federal mandate that universities give lectures to their students about the Constitution on Constitution Day, the Yale reporter writes:

“Constitution and Citizenship Day [marks] the anniversary of the first meeting of the 1787 Constitutional Convention.“

The 17th of September 1787 was not the first, but the last meeting of the convention, the meeting at which the Constitution was signed.



II. Hysterical: The article quotes one Yale historian saying that the new mandate proves the American government is becoming the “thought police.”

UD is confident that even if pressed to offer some form of instruction about the Constitution on September 17 (the staff of the newspaper, at least, could use it) Yale can come up with something amusing and subversive. It could invite a group of flag burners to demonstrate constitutionally protected speech.



III. Correct: But yes, Yale is right to protest the provision, inserted into a spending bill by icky Robert Byrd.