This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

DISAPPOINTMENT


From today's Boston Globe:


Economics Professor Set to Pay for Manure


A Harvard economics professor accused of stealing horse manure from a 98-year-old Rockport farmer received a market lesson yesterday as charges against him were dismissed but restitution was set at an amount he once deemed ''artificially inflated."

Martin Weitzman, 63, agreed to pay $600 to Charlie Lane for one truckload of manure Weitzman took from the farmer on April 1. The going rate for a truckload of manure is about $20.

The professor was charged with larceny, trespassing, and destruction of property in a case that drew international attention. The case in Gloucester District Court was put off as Weitzman insisted on either a trial or a settlement that did not call for him to admit guilt. The settlement also requires Weitzman to pay $300 to the Rockport Boy Scouts, instead of performing community service.

"I learned a lot, but it wasn't worth the agitation," Weitzman said after yesterday's hearing.

Essex Assistant District Attorney Stephen Patten objected to the deal, saying that a professor from Harvard, ''one of the finest institutions in our nation," should be held responsible for his actions. The prosecutor said he wanted, at the very least, an admission from Weitzman that he took the manure without permission.

Weitzman, an avid gardener who sought the manure for his Gloucester flower beds, has contended he received permission several years ago from another farmer, which he interpreted as a blanket approval for removing manure from the Rockport fields.

"If he shouldn't be held accountable, either by exercising his right to a trial or admitting to what he did, then who should be held accountable?" Patten asked Gloucester District Court Judge Richard Mori.

But the judge, who recalled fond boyhood memories of traveling with his grandfather to get manure for the garden, said he didn't expect Weitzman would run afoul of the law again. "I have many cases to try," Mori said, adding that he accepted the settlement "in the interest of justice."

Lane also said he was satisfied with the deal. The farmer said "no trespassing" was clearly posted on his land and he believes Weitzman drove off with manure from his fields several times, not just on the day he was arrested.

But Lane said it didn't matter to him that Weitzman did not have to admit any guilt.
"I don't care what they do as long as I get my $600," said Lane.




UD cannot help thinking how much fun a trial would have been. She finds herself bitterly echoing the statement of the District Attorney: "If he shouldn't be held accountable, either by exercising his right to a trial or admitting to what he did, then who should be held accountable?"

Exactly. Was this an act of God? The devil? Nature, in its awesome mystery?

No. Professor Weitzman and Professor Weitzman alone bears responsibility for his actions, and should have been held accountable for them.

UD also believes that putting a judge on this case who is himself “fond” of manure was a travesty. Is there no judge in the state of Massachusetts at least neutral on the subject of shit?