This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Thursday, October 20, 2005

DO YOU UNDERSTAND…

…the complexities of race, power, gender, class, sexual orientation and privilege in American society? UD does not hesitate to admit that she does not. In trying to envisage the paragon that does, she pictures the World’s Ultimate Critical Theorist, a pale foucauldian kept functioning with massive transfusions from the undead…

And yet at Washington State University’s school of education, the overwhelming majority of students reviewed for inclusion in the program under this standard have been admitted and retained. Judy Mitchell, dean of the program, explains.

"We've evaluated 1,364 students under our current standards over the past three years and 1,330 have been recommended for teacher certification."


Not only that, but, this morning’s AP article continues, “Of the 34 who haven't been recommended, some are still doing their student teaching, while others had health problems or a change in major, [Mitchell] said.”

In short, virtually all of the people who apply for admission to this education program understand the complexities of race, power, babadeebabadeebabadeeba.

But now,

Washington State University is reviewing its policies on evaluating the character of students in the teacher training program after a student alleged the College of Education was biased against conservatives.

Provost Robert Bates said Tuesday the matter is under review within the college, which is under fire for evaluating students in a way that makes personal political beliefs grounds for failure.

At issue is an evaluation form that asks if a student exhibits an understanding of the complexities of race, power, gender, class, sexual orientation and privilege in American society.



Something in the way the form is worded, it seems, has allowed WSU to dismiss a student in very good standing because he’s politically conservative. (For details, go here.)



Dean Mitchell doesn’t see what the fuss is about. The “issue has been blown out of proportion.”

Yet how much can a woman whose online cv is 25 pages of tiny type know about proportion?