This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Zapping Your Peer















the shadows lengthen for dr. raj persaud


Times being what they are, it takes hours, not days, for one plagiarism story to push another off the front page. We’ve hardly had time to be shocked by Brad Vice’s appropriation of material in his now-shredded short story collection, and already our heads are being whipped around to a much bigger story, this one involving the Dr. Phil of the Brits, Raj Persaud:



Britain's most ubiquitous psychiatrist was yesterday at the centre of a plagiarism row after it emerged that substantial portions of an article he had written for a medical journal were copied from the work of an American academic.


The article written by Raj Persaud in the February edition of Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry was withdrawn and a retraction printed, but it went unnoticed outside the mental health community. One of the youngest doctors to become a consultant at the highly respected Maudsley teaching hospital in London, and boasting eight degrees, Dr Persaud writes on mental health matters in a string of publications and has presented the Radio 4 psychology programme All in the Mind.


UD likes that Persaud’s victim is a colleague of her husband’s at the University of Maryland:

The alleged plagiarism came to light when Thomas Blass, professor of psychology at the University of Maryland, happened upon Dr Persaud's article. The piece, entitled "Why The Media Refuses To Obey," was about the social psychologist Stanley Milgram, famous for his 1963 "obedience" experiments, when people were encouraged to "electrocute" peers as punishment for a mistake.


Persaud should definitely have anticipated that Blass would happen upon his article, since Blass is a Milgram fanatic.

Professor Blass has written a book and numerous articles on Milgram. He said he was shocked by the similarity between Dr Persaud's piece and his work. "I am reading it [Dr Persaud's piece] and all of my words are echoing back at me," he told the Guardian. "He had taken paragraphs from my work, word for word. Over 50% of his piece was my work, which I have spent more than 10 years researching. I felt outrage, disbelief and incredulity this could happen, that a person who is himself a writer could do this. It's very disconcerting."



Yet more disconcerting is that this is the second time Persaud has done it. To Blass:


…Yesterday Prof Blass said he earlier complained over another Milgram article by Dr Persaud in the TES which appeared to borrow heavily from the American's work: "I communicated directly with [Persaud] and pointed out as much of half of his article came verbatim from me. In his response, he said he didn't see the final version before it goes to press, and said the subeditors must have taken out the quotation marks and citation at the bottom." Dr Persaud then offered "as reparation" to give Prof Blass necessary credit "in the very next column" and would also apologise for the omission.

Though a reference to Prof Blass's book on Milgram was added to the article's web version, an apology never appeared in any of Dr Persaud's subsequent writings for the TES. When asked why this was, Dr Persaud said: "I offered an apology, but didn't receive a response from Blass so assumed he was happy with the website reference. If he had come back asking for an apology, I would have definitely given one."