This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Buyer's Remorse...

...has definitely set in at the University of Wisconsin. After a few heady days defending the free speech rights of 9/11 conspiracy theorist and faculty member Kevin Barrett, the provost has leaned in for a closer look.

The distinction between Barrett's right to bark like a dog on the subject of 9/11, and the university's obligation to inflict Barrett's barking on its students, has, in the light of day, become clear to the provost, judging by the angry letter he's just written Barrett (who is scheduled to teach in the fall). Here's part of an AP story about it:


[The provost writes:] "In summary, if you continue to identify yourself with UW-Madison in your personal political messages or illustrate an inability to control your interest in publicity for your ideas, I would lose confidence ..."

...[The provost] scold[s] Barrett for identifying himself as a UW-Madison instructor in e-mails in which he challenged others to debate his theories. The provost said the challenges suggest "that you speak for the university -- precisely what I told you was inappropriate in that context."


Note the patronizing nature of the email. The provost writes to Barrett not as a colleague but as a wayward child.

No doubt this tone will offend Barrett (who after all is in possession of truths about the world the provost can never hope to grasp), and he will respond in kind, setting off a long epistolary give and take which we will all follow in the papers.