Links
Archives
Monday, September 18, 2006
Are Academics Tougher? Daniel Drezner explicates The Siegel, a Chekhovian tragedy in one act: [D]espite [Lee] Siegel's status as a professional critic, he seemed incapable of tolerating any form of criticism leveled at his writing -- even if the criticism was, in Siegel's eyes, an expression of pure id by anonymous commenters. Not sure I agree. What's striking about academics, as Drezner says, is that they're accustomed to reasoned criticism of their writing. My co-author and I have just read through three closely argued pages of response to our manuscript, The Return of Beauty to Literary Studies. The reader for the press recommends publishing it, but he/she has plenty to say about certain sections that need revision. Not only do we expect that; we welcome it as a sign that the reviewer read our work carefully and took it seriously. The ad hominem stuff of the blogosphere is very different. I think most academics -- protected from the fray -- would find it appalling. No - I think the explanation for the Siegel fiasco lies in the man's peculiar combination of extremely intense vanity and extremely intense aggression. That was an academic way of putting it. What I mean is he's out of his effing mind. |