This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

New Jersey's University of Medicine and Dentistry:
INCREDIBLY Corrupt.
And getting stronger by the day.




Today's New York Times:



Nearly a year after avoiding prosecution for Medicaid fraud by consenting to have a federal monitor investigate its finances, the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey is engaging in “illegal activity” that “persists to this day,” according to a report from the monitor released on Monday.

The report also accused the university’s interim president, Bruce C. Vladeck, who was appointed by Gov. Jon S. Corzine in the spring to restore credibility, of “trying to refute, rebut and bury” information about violations of anti-kickback laws. It was the first time that the federal monitor, Herbert J. Stern, had directly criticized Mr. Vladeck.

The report charged that university officials at “all levels” were “complicit” in concocting an illegal plan to pay 18 cardiologists nearly $6 million, starting in 2002, to refer their patients to the university’s hospital, in violation of federal law. Though school officials were warned on Sept. 25 by their own consultant that such practices could be illegal, they did not report it to Mr. Stern, as required under the deferred-prosecution agreement that they signed in December 2005 to avoid criminal charges, according to the report.

The cardiology kickback scheme led to $36 million in illegal Medicare and Medicaid payments that the school may have to repay, along with $43 million in potential fines and penalties, the report said. The doctors who participated in the plan could face lawsuits, the loss of their medical licenses and even federal criminal charges, though one interviewed on Monday denied all the allegations in the report and said he had fulfilled his responsibilities at the university.

For more than a year, the university, which is the state’s medical school, has been battered by an onslaught of bad news, both in print and in official investigations, suggesting that it was home to tens of millions of dollars of Medicaid fraud, wasteful spending and no-bid contracts awarded to vendors with ties to elected officials or former university trustees. The United States attorney, Christopher J. Christie, also threatened to prosecute the school.

In his report on Monday, Mr. Stern, a former judge and United States attorney, focused on how the university had been anxious in 2002 and 2003 about the prospect of losing its license to perform heart operations at University Hospital unless its cardiac surgeons conducted such procedures with more regularity.

In the report, Mr. Stern said he was particularly disturbing that Dr. Vladeck, an experienced health administrator, appeared to have misled investigators and downplayed allegations of wrongdoing found in the university consultant’s report in September. Rather than being told of the consultant’s report, Mr. Stern said, he learned of the cardiology scheme by reading about it in a legal publication about a settlement in a related whistleblower’s lawsuit.


... In the report on Monday, Mr. Stern wrote that school officials, “feverishly bent” on increasing the number of procedures, came up with a plan to hire cardiologists for no-show jobs as clinical associate professors, paying them $150,000 a year or more to do nothing but refer their own patients to the hospital. Many of the cardiologists either had never used the hospital before, the report said, or had complained about its facilities and staff.

Some of these allegations first came to light in an article in The New Jersey Law Journal about a settlement in June between the university and Dr. Rohit Arora, the former chief of the school’s cardiology division. In all, the cardiologists were reported to have received $5.7 million.



What will it take for the state to shut down this organized criminal activity?