This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Small addendum to
recent post [scroll down]
about plagiarism


In an article in this morning’s Philadelphia Inquirer, about the rather weird ongoing “conceptual plagiarism” controversy in the University of Pennsylvania sociology department, we get another example of the tendency of plagiarists to plagiarize on a regular basis (a tendency I discuss - scroll down - in the post titled “A Few More Words About Plagiarism”):

Maria Kefalas, one of the authors being accused of conceptual plagiarism, “faced questions about attribution in her previous book - questions that were resolved when she posted a list of corrections…”

It's not at all clear, however, given the conceptual fuzziness of "conceptual plagiarism," that Kefalas and her co-author have done anything wrong.