College sports… cost a lot, and when it comes to vying for the money needed to keep big-time athletes in whirlpools, the field is slanted heavily toward state schools. This is especially true in football, where only sixteen of the 117 schools in Division I-A — college football's highest level — are private.

Most private schools simply cannot afford the multiple millions it takes to pay for the equipment, 80-plus scholarships, and six-figure (or higher) coaches' salaries needed to compete on the highest level.

Unfortunately, success in football leads to dominance in lots of other sports because football offers a big profit, a rarity in intercollegiate athletics. The result is that mammoth, football-playing public schools are increasingly dictating terms in all Division I sports, including basketball, the only other profit-maker.

…[S]tate universities have much bigger student bodies — and therefore alumni bases and football crowds — than private schools, in large part because taxpayers absorb so much of their costs. So megaversities like Florida State and the University of Georgia have more than 26,000 undergraduates, while private schools like Duke and Vanderbilt have only about 6,000.

But having the size necessary to fill stadiums and arenas with tens-of-thousands of fans is just the start of state schools' advantage. Being able to build palatial stadia is next.

To be fair, much of the funding for state megaversities' facilities comes from student fees and private sources. But don't be fooled. Money is fungible, so as a practical matter taxpayers are subsidizing everything on state university campuses. Students are able to afford heftier athletics fees, for instance, because taxpayers are handling so much of kids' educational costs. Similarly, private donors are able to concentrate resources on athletics because taxpayers are covering academic needs.

Even with all these hidden advantages, though, states still sometimes decide to put taxpayer dollars directly into college sports. The state of Pennsylvania, for example, recently spent $53 million to help build a 12,500-seat basketball arena at the University of Pittsburgh. And don't look now, Minnesotans, but Golden Gopher football boosters are lobbying the state to take $100 million from you to help build them a new football stadium.

The fleecing of taxpayers for sports, of course, is the most disgusting part of this story. But for thousands of small schools and their fans the tale is also sad because, for them, the joy of intercollegiate athletics is slowly being destroyed by megaversities that take public dollars to drive the little guys off the courts and fields.

Sports Illustrated's Frank Deford, lamenting the plight of small Catholic colleges, recently captured that feeling of loss. Though long ago driven out of football, he wrote, until just a few decades ago small schools were still able to compete on a level basketball court. But then "the NCAA expanded its field, big television money came in, and large state institutions that had never cared much for basketball wanted a bite out of the apple."

Now, "even the richest Catholic colleges have trouble competing for the best players when the big-time public schools can offer state-of-the-art facilities, special team dorms, even chartered game flights. Frankly, it's taken a lot of fun out of college basketball."