This is an archived page. Images and links on this page may not work. Please visit the main page for the latest updates.

 
 
 
Read my book, TEACHING BEAUTY IN DeLILLO, WOOLF, AND MERRILL (Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming), co-authored with Jennifer Green-Lewis. VISIT MY BRANCH CAMPUS AT INSIDE HIGHER ED





UD is...
"Salty." (Scott McLemee)
"Unvarnished." (Phi Beta Cons)
"Splendidly splenetic." (Culture Industry)
"Except for University Diaries, most academic blogs are tedious."
(Rate Your Students)
"I think of Soltan as the Maureen Dowd of the blogosphere,
except that Maureen Dowd is kind of a wrecking ball of a writer,
and Soltan isn't. For the life of me, I can't figure out her
politics, but she's pretty fabulous, so who gives a damn?"
(Tenured Radical)

Friday, September 14, 2007

How I Lost that Appointment

Badly mismanaged opinion piece in the LA Times by Michael V. Drake, UC Irvine chancellor, in which he does the opposite of what the title of his seven short paragraphs promises.

WHY I LET CHEMERINSKY GO got me all excited, and I'm not the only one. A lot of people are eager to know why he chopped Chemerinsky.

But the piece is classic prose-nothingness. [For another example of prose-nothingness, go here.] It doesn't say why Chemerinsky was sent packing. It simply denies he was sent packing for political reasons.



Drake says, in excruciating B-school speak, that he concluded he and Chemerinsky "would not be able to partner effectively to build a world-class law school at UC Irvine." That's it. Otherwise, the statement is a bunch of denials: It wasn't political; it wasn't about academic freedom.

Then what was it about? Why did you let him go? The "partner" thing leaves only one strong possibility open: Drake doesn't like the guy. Personality clash. Can't work with him.

In which case he shouldn't have hired him. The fact that he did hire him, and then, in what looks like a panic, flew down to Durham to unhire him, makes Drake out to be awfully emotionally volatile.