How bad does she think it could get? Matter-of-factly, she says: “My fear is we’re headed to civil war.” She restates a basic truth about the US. “There’s a lot of guns. There’s a lot of gun violence. There’s a habituation to violence that’s very American, that Europeans don’t understand.” Her worry is that the guns are accompanied by a new “permissiveness” that comes from the top, that was typified by Trump’s indulgence of the January 6 rioters, even those who wanted to murder his vice-president. As she puts it: “You can feel that brewing.” …

[W]e talk about those US citizens who put Trump back in the White House, even though, as she puts it, they knew who he was. “Nothing was hidden. People had plenty of time to think about it, and they chose this. And that disgust, I couldn’t shake that. I thought: ‘People wanted this – and I don’t want to have anything to do with this.’”

Biggest protest in US history.

LOLOLOL

There’ll always be a South Carolina.

Bloomsday is tomorrow, and I suppose UD‘s little contribution to it would go like this:

Leader’s bio of Ellmann, who himself wrote the great bio of James Joyce, is currently much talked about. Ellmann was a friend/colleague of my then-boyfriend (and I mean then! we’re talking about what? the early ‘seventies?) at Northwestern University.

One afternoon Ellmann came over to our place to ask him a favor.

Ellmann had written a long angry defense of himself against some hostile reviewer – my memory is that the review appeared in the NY Review of Books, and Ellmann intended the defense to appear there? – and he wanted my bf to submit it under his name. As if he had written it!

Wee UD sat on a couch by the fireplace, listening to my bf, a professor much-junior to Ellmann, agree — uncomfortably — to do this. I recall the two of them reading over the letter together, my bf making occasional edits, and then the official handing off of the thing from Ellmann to my bf.

I was shocked! Tried talking to the bf about it and he shrugged. Let’s not talk about it.

It was a strange early lesson for UD (must have barely been in my twenties) in the ways of the world. The ways of some worlds.

The United States of America: Where we give everyone a gun and then watch what happens.

The focus on 2025 Ocean Boulevard shootings [in Myrtle Beach] began on April 26th when 11 people were sent to the hospital in a police officer involved incident where the juvenile who fired into a crowd was killed.

Several Ocean Boulevard shootings on successive weekends have happened since. Day trippers from towns approximately 100 miles in circumference to Myrtle Beach cause much of the violence … downtown on Ocean Boulevard.

Unsupervised teenagers ranging from 16 to 18 carry guns with them to the beach. Despite the pattern, Myrtle Beach police have yet to come up with a system for dealing with these unsupervised teens before the violence begins.

SC does not have truancy laws enabling MBPD to detain unsupervised juveniles until their parents retrieve them. Even when they identify potential violent teens, their hands are tied until the shootings start.

******************

Can this really be? A police force can’t detain suspicious people? They have to stand there waiting for them to start shooting?

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AeWQsfZJV

… Garrett Park’s NO KINGS protest this morning. Good turnout, and tons of honks, raised fists, waves, and thumbs up from cars.

How Trump won.

Douglass High School on the city’s West Side now has 27 employees for 28 students.

That includes six regular education teachers, six special education teachers, a school counselor, a college and career coach, a conflict resolution specialist, a restorative justice coordinator, and an assistant principal and principal. The cost to run the school is $93,000 per student.

… dehumanizing.

*********************

Consider on the other hand Mona Eltahawy:

A bizarre political correctness has tied the tongues of those who would normally rally to women’s rights. One blogger, a woman, lamented that “[then-president] Sarkozy’s anti-burqa stance deprives women of identity.” It’s precisely the opposite: It’s the burqa that deprives a woman of identity...

Why the silence as some of our women fade into black either as a form of identity politics, a protest against the state or out of acquiescence to Salafism?

As a Muslim woman and a feminist I would ban the burqa.

**********************

And consider Marie Gilbert:

As a French feminist, I am surprised to see English-speaking feminists defend women’s right to wear the niqab. The niqab may be a religious symbol (something that is still, however, the object of much debate among specialists of Islam) and one that is (sometimes freely) worn for religious reasons. Those feminists who so openly criticise any stand against the niqab, however, seem to forget that the niqab, beyond its religious dimension, is also, very clearly, a sign of women’s inequality and inferiority. This, rather than an anti-religious feeling or Islamophobia, accounts for the French ban and for the call, voiced by some French personalities, on Muslim women to renounce wearing the niqab.

***************************

Back to the burqa defender —

“The bloodstained perpetrators [are] sitting in the halls of political power,” writes she. Right out of “Politics and the English Language.”

Well babe see this is Massachusetts and the reason we have among the lowest gun deaths in the nation is because we bar idiots like you from our schools. Conceal carry your gun in Louisiana. You do it here, you’re trespassed from our school.

“[She is barred from attending] the sixth grade breakfast at Oak Ridge School with her daughter, and she asked the committee to allow her to attend.” Boohoo. Move to Shreveport.

Datz me. One of the No Kings demonstrations goes right along my town’s only through street, and Les UDs, plus UD’s cousin and her husband, will be out there with flags and signs.

Let’s take this one element at a time.

If anyone ever tries to sell you on the idea that wearing a burqa or niqab is comfortable, feel free to laugh in their face. Anyone who has ever witnessed what it’s like to walk around cities, often in sweltering temperatures, draped head to toe in black, knows just how punishing the garment is. Go ahead and argue that it pleases Allah to see women and little girls with no peripheral vision try to navigate busy streets. I mean, that argument at least is in line with twisted hyper-modesty edicts. But don’t try telling us that these deathly weeds are comfortable.

As for safety: Walking around severely perceptually and physically hampered is not safe at all; and if you mean safe from the raping ways of all evil men… Men who find your eight year old daughter as evilly seductive as they find you… Look at the normally dressed women around you, moving freely among normal men. Try to work on your attitude toward men rather than cling to an outsized sense of the degree of danger to you they represent.

Do you really think the people gazing at your invisibility behind full body black cloth feel respect? As your husband in jeans and a t-shirt, and similarly free boy children, gambol about in front of you?

There’s nothing patronizing about pointing out that there’s something disturbing about someone whose lived experience tells her that walking around with a symbolically rich black fabric over her mouth generates personal comfort and respect from others.

No kidding.