Of course. It’s been burning for years. It makes the University of Georgia look like the University of Bologna. In 1088.
Of course. It’s been burning for years. It makes the University of Georgia look like the University of Bologna. In 1088.
… people complain about how much university presidents are paid.
Before they start moaning, they should do some homework. It’s a hard job! And its responsibilities are changing all the time.
More and more university presidents, for instance, are spending more and more time as liquor salesmen.
First at the University of Minnesota, and now at the University of New Mexico, academic leaders spend a lot of time lobbying local governments on behalf of the principle that universities should fix their budgets by encouraging rich people at their sports events to tank up.
Albuquerque’s city council said no, and UNM is really pissed. Its athletics director sent an email to the rich people calling the councilmembers hypocrites, so, you know, the war’s on, and UNM’s president is gearing up to fight this to the finish in court. It’s the principle of the thing! If an American university isn’t allowed to use rich alcoholics to pay off its stadium debts, what’s next? A government ban on Four Loko?
University presidents don’t only set intellectual agendas; they set a certain tone. Imagine a university without drunk people reeling out of stadiums late at night into their cars! The next time you think of complaining about the money university presidents make, think again.
Its most illustrious alumni have written a letter calling for President Hazel O’Leary’s resignation. Even more importantly:
The authors… blasted the university for allowing its attorneys to argue in court “the emotionally bankrupt and morally egregious declaration that art created by Caucasians is of no relevance to the education of Fisk’s African American students, only art created by African Americans.”
Background here.
… some of America’s best schools of medicine in the last few years involves the painstaking, expensive training of doctors who almost immediately stop practicing and instead go for megabucks as investment managers. Why make half a million a year using the knowledge you’ve learned at Yale medical school to heal people, when you can make five million dollars a year doing trades and not get your hands dirty?
I mean, so what if you took a hotly contested seat in a Yale classroom — a seat hundreds of people actually dedicated to medicine tried to get and failed?
For instance: Chip Skowron, Yale MD and PhD, used a lot of taxpayer money to get himself all educated as a clinician/researcher and then said Fuck it. I’d rather be a hedgie.
Skowron put quite the spin on his decision in this 2003 Bloomberg article on doctors abandoning medicine for hedge funds:
Skowron said that during his residency, senior doctors complained about administrative burdens, declining pay and the strain of paying insurance premiums. “My current job allows me to look at the newest developments in oncology and to translate that into investment opportunities,” said Skowron, who manages health-care investments at Greenwich, Conn.-based FrontPoint Partners LLC, another hedge fund.
I guess I was little dim! Spent years and years in med school and grad school and it never occurred to me to discover the nature of the vocation for which I was training. Finally, in my residency, the horror of medical practice became apparent – the soullessness of paperwork, the growing impoverishment of physicians… I’ve gone from the meaninglessness, the shabbiness, of clinical medicine, to offering the world investment opportunities…
*************************
But you know what they say: No opportunities without risks. Medicine may have its drawbacks, but so does trading.
When FrontPoint Partners came to light on Tuesday as the unnamed hedge fund that federal authorities said had traded on inside information from a French doctor, so did the name of another doctor: Chip Skowron.
FrontPoint said late Tuesday that it had placed Dr. Skowron on leave indefinitely. The firm’s announcement follows the arrest of Yves Benhamou, the French doctor accused of tipping off an unnamed fund manager about setbacks in a clinical drug trial by Human Genome Sciences.
FrontPoint, which is being spun off by Morgan Stanley, would not elaborate beyond its statement. But the firm’s announcement of Dr. Skowron’s suspension provided an obvious No. 1 guess for anyone trying to figure out the identity of that mystery portfolio manager.
In the Washington Post, Annie Lowrey takes a look at the law school scandal.
[L]aw schools … keep growing. Law schools awarded 43,588 J.D.s last year, up 11.5 percent since 2000. And the American Bar Association’s list of approved law schools now numbers 200, an increase of 9 percent in the past decade. Those newer law schools have a much shakier track record of helping new lawyers get work, but they don’t necessarily cost less than their older, more established counterparts.
… The marquee law schools will be fine. But some of the newer, lower-ranked law schools will shut down.
UD ain’t sure where Lowrey gets her confidence that bad schools will shut down. A law school shut down? UD doesn’t think so. Starting new law schools, as Lowrey points out, is a growth industry.
“We were down in the alumni section and we were watching the step show with our kids and it was great because nobody was drunk,” said Lori Stratton.
The University of Arizona experiments with a no-alcohol zone at homecoming.
… How Colleges Have Given Up On Educating Your Child and What You Can Do About It (helluva subtitle) have asked UD to take a look at the book and write about it. When she receives it from them, she will do that.
… the simple gratitude of former students for professors who were memorably kind to them. In these stories, students who go on to make some money come back to the school and endow scholarships to honor the professors.
Most recently, a Chinese couple who twenty years ago studied with David Kaplan, a music professor at the University of Saskatchewan, just gave a million dollars – the largest donation in its history – to the music school.
Kaplan… was singled out by the two former international students for his effort to help them navigate a new university, a new city and a new culture.
… “David Kaplan took them under his wing and gave them all kinds of encouragement and made sure they succeeded,” said current music department head Gerald Langner.
… Also a former student of Kaplan’s, Langner knows why Xu and Chen remembered their professor 20 after they left the U of S.
“Kaplan has inspired so many students,” Langner said. “He’s one of the best instructors I’ve ever had, period. If it wasn’t for him, I wouldn’t be in music right now.”
This method of a university getting money seems much more attractive to UD than the school, in a quid pro quo, putting its absolutely richest hedge fund guy on the board of trustees.
UD acknowledges that if the hedgie approach works, the university gets not one million but one billion. Yes. She can’t deny this. Game, set, and match. But…
University Diaries brings you another instance of the amazing diversity of college experience, here distilled on one page of the Yale Daily News.
Starting from the top, there’s the announcement of a concert of sacred music. (That particular banner ad might not appear when you open the page. It alternates with others.)
Directly beneath, taking up the rest of the page, there’s a paean to FOUR LOKO, “a cup of coffee with three beers” which tastes like shit and produces, one student says, an “I don’t remember what the fuck happened kind of drunk.”
These two headlines, from the New York Times and The Gothamist, give you a sense of how the mainstream and non-mainstream press are framing this one, an expansion of the Cecilia Chang story [earlier charges against her here].
As the dean of the Institute of Asian Studies at St. John’s, Ms. Chang had the authority to grant 15 scholarships a year. The recipients, most of whom were from overseas, were told they had to work 20 hours a week under her supervision.
The students thought they would be doing work related to the university. Instead, according to the prosecutors, she forced them to perform menial tasks at her home in Jamaica Estates, Queens.
She’s been charged with forced labor and bribery. On top of embezzling.
Slave does seem a bit over the top, though it’s possible yet more lurid coercions and uses could emerge…
St John’s, a Catholic institution, does need to do some thinking. Its 2008 Alumni Outstanding Achievement Award winner is on trial for fraud and bribery; one of its vice-presidents turns out to be – allegedly – quite a monster. She did her thing for years, unimpeded.
Asleep at the wheel is the phrase that comes to mind.
Virtually all good universities generate opinion pieces like this one, by Eve Samborn at Washington University. She begins:
During a class discussion a few weeks ago about existentialist philosophy, my professor informed our class that in the 1950s, every college student in America was reading the works of Jean-Paul Sartre.
She goes on to worry that no comparable figure exists today – a global intellectual posing challenging existential questions, questions discussed inside and outside of the classroom by many students. “[O]ur generation has no revolutionary philosopher to tear down our previously held core beliefs. [O]ur campus shows little interest in finding such a figure.”
One irony here is that her campus enjoyed for many years the presence of William Gass, a remarkable novelist/philosopher (he’s emeritus now) who brilliantly posed the sorts of questions Samborn has in mind. In a 2005 interview, he recalls his teaching days:
[T]hat was one of the nice things about teaching. You get to assign books you love. It’s hard to beat, that kind of life. You’re reading philosophers who are just incredible—they may be creeps [laughs], but it’s wonderful stuff. It’s helpful to you. You learn. It forces you to pay attention to the texts in a way that I think is helpful… Thoreau, for example, … uses the word “margins.” He says, “In my life I like to have wide margins.” Then there’s a sentence about enjoying the sunshine, and meditating, and so forth. Well, he takes all the sounds in the word “margin,” and they just dominate the words that follow. This whole description—from the ms to the ns. And I’m just thinking, My God!, you know. And so: Life is justified.
Gass complains, in the same interview, that philosophy as a discipline has changed in ways that make existential inquiry rare:
In philosophy, there’s been a big shift. Philosophers say that it’s because that’s the way philosophy should be going. But I think it’s because that’s where the money is. Our philosophy department was pretty strong, what was called PNP—philosophy, neurophysiology, psychology. Working again on all kinds of things that interested biologists: artificial intelligence, genetics. And there’s been a shift, generally, in that direction.
UD, at Northwestern in the late ‘seventies, studied Rilke (a big favorite with Gass) with Erich Heller and Sartre with James Edie, and she recalls exactly the sort of intellectual buzz Samborn’s talking about. I’m not sure UD had any very well-formulated core beliefs (the phrase is Samborn’s) but encountering (in Lionel Trilling’s anthology, Literary Criticism) Susan Sontag’s and Alain Robbe-Grillet’s disdain for core beliefs excited her.
Maybe most people in college are careerists; but Samborn speaks for many when she laments the absence of something she’s right to want and expect in college: An atmosphere of sustained and excited and subversive discourse about foundational human questions (And so: Life is justified.). She worries about “what kind of educated people we will become if we have not given sufficient thought to the world.”
One has apparently killed himself there after firing off some shots that seem not to have hit anyone (this is all very preliminary information); the other gunman is apparently still somewhere in the building.
*************************
The Austin Statesman reports that a law professor was shot at by one of the shooters (assuming there are two).
**************************
Only one gunman. Nineteen years old. Seems to have been unable, when it came to it, to kill anyone other than himself.
… has a good take on Suicide Note. (Background here.)
… this week’s elitist whipping boys. I’ve been whipping them. Pretty much everyone’s been whipping them.
There are a few more things to say about Henderson and Peretz, things specific to their membership in university communities. Start with this, from an Atlantic magazine blogger.
I would not have this vast population of people [ – the world’s Muslims – ] presented as smiling egalitarians, characterized by an affinity for peace, love and tickle-fights. I would them presented as problems, brutal and caring, as whole quartiles of humanity tend to be. Bearing that in mind, [Peretz’s] statement “Muslim life is cheap” must be seen not simply as bigoted, but as shockingly stupid. Indeed the precise kind of stupid that hallowed academia exists to disabuse us of.
It’s a simple point, but easily forgotten amid the bigotry of the Peretz remarks. Harvard is the world’s leading university, and, I think, rightly so. When high-profile teachers there go on record, over a long period of time, with gross generalizations, emotional intemperance, and small-minded, in-group, self-regard, they degrade the institution’s intellectual integrity. Worse, they play into the perception that different rules apply to elites, that elites can get away with bad behavior.
On Henderson: Jacob Davies, at Obsidian Wings, has a concise and sensible set of remarks, among them, these responses to Henderson’s fiscal and psychological problems:
Massive debt loads can make you poor whatever your income, and once they’re run up, you don’t get any enjoyment from them. Judging yourself by the standards of wealthy people is a good way to make yourself very unhappy (as is hanging out with wealthy people, often, as many of them didn’t get wealthy by being nice). And you cannot possibly keep up if you try.
I feel bad for the professor for much the same reason I feel bad for anyone who has made a series of bad decisions – that they may have found impossible to avoid making at the time – that have put them in a situation where they are both unhappy and unable to escape the consequences of their actions. I don’t know what advice to offer. But I don’t think avoiding a 4% hike in marginal rates is going to solve his problems.
I’ll add something else, from my perspective as a writer about universities.
Henderson seems a pretty fierce libertarian, complaining, in much of what he has written in response to this dust-up, about the overriding badness of government, and the way it can’t be trusted to do any good with the taxes we give it.
For the sake of moral consistency, Henderson should consider working for private industry. The University of Chicago can give him his enormous salary in part because taxpayers like you and me underwrite non-profit universities. Maybe this is the one and only use of government funds of which Henderson wholly approves; yet I think he owes it to us to explain how he’s able to square being the beneficiary of subsidies with the rest of his social positions.