← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

Explaining Free Speech to the Muslim Student Union

In the aftermath of an organized shout-down of a campus speech by the Israeli ambassador, UC Irvine’s Erwin Chemerinsky clarifies the way free speech works:

The government, including public universities, always can impose time, place and manner restrictions on speech. A person who comes into my classroom and shouts so that I cannot teach surely can be punished without offending the 1st Amendment. Likewise, those who yelled to keep the ambassador from being heard were not engaged in constitutionally protected behavior.

Freedom of speech, on campuses and elsewhere, is rendered meaningless if speakers can be shouted down by those who disagree. The law is well established that the government can act to prevent a heckler’s veto — to prevent the reaction of the audience from silencing the speaker. There is simply no 1st Amendment right to go into an auditorium and prevent a speaker from being heard, no matter who the speaker is or how strongly one disagrees with his or her message.

Margaret Soltan, February 18, 2010 2:31PM
Posted in: free speech

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=21426

3 Responses to “Explaining Free Speech to the Muslim Student Union”

  1. cloudminder Says:

    david horowitz at cal and emory
    ahmadinejad at columbia
    -we’ve been here before

  2. theprofessor Says:

    Bravo for Chemerinsky.

  3. Josh Says:

    cloudminder: heaphy at cal state sacramento.

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories