Here, via a link provided by Mike, a reader, is a scholarly paper with 144 authors. UD‘s used to seeing thirty or forty med school professors listed at the tops of papers, but these are astronomers, and — as Carl Sagan used to say — there are billions and billions of them.
A writer at the Times Higher Education Supplement points out that there are 36.3 words per author in this piece, so assuming authorship is truly shared among the 144, each one wrote about two sentences.
Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=22475
Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
April 7th, 2010 at 10:30PM
There’s nothing unusual about this. When I was contemplating grad school in physics, in the late 1980s, it wasn’t too hard to find a paper whose list of authors was nearly as long as the paper itself. Authorship means something different in the modern experimental sciences–especially large-scale, high-budget sciences–than it does in the humanities. An author in the sciences is someone who made a significant contribution to the results reported in the paper. If we in the humanities played by the same rules, the colleagues, referees, and perhaps even copyeditors whom we thank in our book acknowledgements or article notes would be counted as authors, though not first authors (order matters). Writing a paper is not the same as authoring a paper.
There are cases where scientists have played with this convention, such as the famous Alpher-Bethe-Gamow paper (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpher–Bethe–Gamow_paper), to which George Gamow added his friend Hans Bethe’s name to mimic the first three letters of the Greek alphabet.
Ghost writing is a whole ‘nother kettle of fish.
April 8th, 2010 at 7:28AM
Large collaborations are pretty common in high-energy physics. E.g., this is the ‘default’ CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab) author list.
April 8th, 2010 at 3:30PM
In astronomy, it is often customary to write a paper describing the properties of a survey or instrument, and to include everyone involved with survey, including data reduction specialists, engineers and other technical personnel. This lets people who spend most of their time building scientific instruments to get credit for their years of work. Then, usually follow-up papers cite this original paper, and have fewer authors.
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey is one of the largest collaborations in astronomy, and is comparable in scale
to large particle physics experiments.
Chad Orzel makes a similar response at http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2010/04/long_author_lists_and_books_no.php