← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

Limerick

Response to the Disciplinary Committee

Say Biederman, Wilens, and Spencer:
“Ah hell, we just do what we can, sir.
You can’t avoid sleaze
When you’ve got our disease:
The absence of all moral sensors.”

*******************************

(UD thanks B. for the link.)

*******************************

Update:

“You could have made more nice statements about the drug.’’

More on the culture of academic psychiatry in the United States.

********************************

Lest we forget.

… Biederman is a leading proponent of the off-label use of antipsychotic drugs to treat bipolar illness in children. His work is widely seen as contributing to an explosive growth in such prescriptions, and much of his support came from companies that benefited from his research.

Margaret Soltan, July 2, 2011 12:17AM
Posted in: conflict of interest, limericks

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=31345

2 Responses to “Limerick”

  1. dmf Says:

    http://www.podcast.tv/video-episodes/reasoning-with-hypocrisy-robert-kurzban-on-the-modular-mind-13847448.html

  2. adam Says:

    Biederman was under fire;
    John Harvard scarce contained his ire:
    Don’t you dare make me look bad
    Or I will say that you’re the cad:
    Liar, liar, pants on fire.

    It took three years for me to figure
    How to make your guilt look bigger
    Than my reckless pandering:
    We really like the cash you bring
    Until the point where people snigger.

    So, won’t you go away, you pest?
    At Harvard you’re no longer blessed.
    Why don’t you just bugger off,
    Set up shop with Nemeroff?
    Down there they’ll say that you’re the best!

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories