Harvard’s Marc Hauser (background here – scroll down) didn’t like people monkeying around in his lab.
In an important essay on Hauser, and on research fraud in general, Charles Gross concludes the obvious:
[I]rreversible damage has been done to the field of animal cognition, [and] to Harvard University…
Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=34235
Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
December 25th, 2011 at 6:48AM
Leaving aside outright fraud, there are myriad other problems which exist.
Many PIs are unwilling to put in the time that is required to teach their students how to keep a decent notebook in the first place.
“Experiments of this and such type require the following detailed information regarding experimental apparatus and procedures: yada, yada, yada. It is imperative to obtain the following data from this experiment, to record it in the following format, and to archive the raw data according to our established protocols, etc. etc.”
Simply specifying these things is not enough, one must be willing to bust chops. Professors take the path of least resistance, and simply trust that their students are on the ball.
There is ONE prof. in my department who demands to see that notebooks are in order on a regular basis (every 3 weeks he checks to see if entries up to date, specific data recorded and backed up, procedures written in the style of our professional association, etc.) This professor is seventy something years old, and will be retiring in one year, and after that the department is full of hacks!
To be fair, certain standards are generally met for publication, but there is much unpublished work out there that might be completed later on by other students. However, any after the fact determination is going to take much more time and effort than it should and this is a real waste of time for those who are tasked with doing so.
Those groups (or individuals) who fail to provide good quality supporting information earn themselves a bad reputation. Everyone in the field knows who is cutting corners and who is a pro, let there be no doubt about that.
Surprisingly:
Work done by hacks may be viable, even very good, and this is often the case! Moreover, if those published procedures were written by someone who was shooting from the hip and they still give reproducible results, then those methods are idiot proof! This is a very good thing in the end, but the inefficiency of getting to such circumstances, the details lost which might have given rise to greater understanding or birthed new projects represent a very high cost to have paid.
As you might have guessed, I speak only on matters relevant to the hard sciences: no human subjects, no animals, no black-box analytical techniques, no bio even, just pure and applied physical sciences.
I cannot imagine that usable results could ever be had taking this approach to biology, let alone ‘evolved morality’.