A little bird told me that DoJ could reschedule marijuana as something other than Schedule I. http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/811.htm
The implications for federal enforcement are clear. Sadly, POTUS will have none of it.
This despite his initial stance: that medical marijuana providers adhering to state laws and regulations would not face prioritized federal enforcement absent indication of diversion to other than medical use.
Of course, that kind of statement provides a lot of wiggle room. This allows the president to pretend that his position during and immediately after the campaign was something other than deference to the State Legislatures.
Makes Clinton’s quibbling over the definition of “is” look like amateur hour.
May 1st, 2012 at 8:03AM
A little bird told me that DoJ could reschedule marijuana as something other than Schedule I.
http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/811.htm
The implications for federal enforcement are clear. Sadly, POTUS will have none of it.
This despite his initial stance: that medical marijuana providers adhering to state laws and regulations would not face prioritized federal enforcement absent indication of diversion to other than medical use.
Of course, that kind of statement provides a lot of wiggle room. This allows the president to pretend that his position during and immediately after the campaign was something other than deference to the State Legislatures.
Makes Clinton’s quibbling over the definition of “is” look like amateur hour.