← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

Extremely huffy vice-chancellor decides to get legalistic and pat himself on the back for superior cultural sensitivity.

We’ve already noted on this blog that since Australian universities stand for nothing, they have no trouble allowing gender segregated events on their campuses. MEN IN FRONT; WOMEN IN THE BACK. AND KEEP YOUR MOUTHS SHUT.

Fine, fine. Different strokes for different folks, says the University of Melbourne vice-chancellor, quite on the defensive after everyone, including the opposition leader and the Minister for the Status of Women, expressed shock at his university’s nonchalant collusion with what are arguably the most reactionary forces in the world today. After all, the university explained, this was an “external organisation.” Not my business, man!

So the v-c’s backtracking a bit, now that everyone’s squawking, and he’s pointing out some niceties in the discrimination law — without noting that the discrimination in this case is coming from that external organization about which his university cares not a whit. Without noting that universities not only have a right – they have a duty – to stand for the principles of democracy, and to bar (which, the v-c hastens to add, Melbourne will in fact start doing from now on) organizations founded on discrimination.

But tut-tut, says the v-c. All religious organizations deserve respect and consideration.

It’s anti-democratic, that is, to be intolerant of any group that calls itself religious, no matter what that group believes and does. And certainly no university has the right to “impose” what the v-c calls its “preferences” on anybody.

That’s why UD said in her last post about this that if you’re fed up with British universities and their intolerant respect for democratic principles, go to Australia.

*************

Jennifer Oriel gets it said.

 

*************

A professor at Melbourne
who specializes in Islam sets the vice-chancellor straight.

[I]n the most sacred place on earth, the sacred mosque in Mecca, there is no separate section for men or women. Millions of Muslims visit the mosque and pray each year without the need to separate men from women.

Gender equality and associated values are fundamental to Australian society and those values must be respected by all, including those few Muslims who may not necessarily agree with them.

I find it very troubling that there are some who feel that they have a right to send women, whether Muslims or not, to the back of a lecture theatre as though this was the most natural place for women in such a setting.

For the men who organise public events to require women participants to go to the back of the facility is a breach of trust and a misuse of the facilities of the university.

It is also demeaning to women. Iā€™m sure most Australian Muslims would also be deeply offended by such practices and would indeed question the connection between the practice and their understanding of Islam.

Yes, it’s grotesque that this man must clarify basic human rights and the proper use of his university to the vice-chancellor. But I’m afraid that’s where we are now. At least in Australia.

Margaret Soltan, April 28, 2013 5:00PM
Posted in: democracy

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=39778

2 Responses to “Extremely huffy vice-chancellor decides to get legalistic and pat himself on the back for superior cultural sensitivity.”

  1. University Diaries » “Promotion of pursuit of an Islamic state ruled by Sharia Law at whatever cost ā€“ even through the slaughter of non-conforming humans ā€“ has no place at an Australian university.” Says:

    […] before the vice-chancellor starts lecturing us about religious freedom he could check out some of the organizations his university […]

  2. GTWMA Says:

    http://www.gwhatchet.com/2013/04/29/staff-editorial-the-university-wont-talk-heres-why-it-should/

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories