University Diaries » “The families argue that Remington violated Connecticut’s Unfair Trade Practices Act by recklessly marketing the rifle to disturbed young men like the Sandy Hook gunman through product placement in violent video games and advertising pitches like ‘consider your man card reissued.’”

UD at Inside Higher Ed About Margaret Soltan Other Writings Subscribe to UD's Feeds

← Previous Post: Few American Universities Have a History as Sordid as San Diego State. | Next Post: “You can count on nature doing what nature has been doing forever. Do you think you’re going to rush in on Nature and grab off an insight?” →

“The families argue that Remington violated Connecticut’s Unfair Trade Practices Act by recklessly marketing the rifle to disturbed young men like the Sandy Hook gunman through product placement in violent video games and advertising pitches like ‘consider your man card reissued.'”

And the Supreme Court just said go ahead and sue.

Margaret Soltan, November 12, 2019 2:15PM
Posted in: guns

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=62621

Comment on this Entry

Search

Latest UD posts at IHE

Read more UD at IHE…

Archives

2024 (216)
2023 (733)
2022 (852)
2021 (751)
2020 (789)
2019 (753)
2018 (803)
2017 (749)
2016 (863)
2015 (861)
2014 (1052)
2013 (1019)
2012 (1187)
2011 (1399)
2010 (1372)
2009 (1450)
2007 (1)

Categories

University Diaries is powered by WordPress
Report web site problems to [email protected]