← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

The editorial is typically weaselly, but the fact that DEI statements suck seems to have gotten through even to the Washington Post.

 As the University of California at Davis’s vice chancellor for DEI explained, “In these searches, it is the candidate’s diversity statement that is considered first; only those who submit persuasive and inspiring statements can advance for complete consideration.” In one faculty search at University of California at Berkeley, around 75 percent of applicants were screened out of consideration — irrespective of criteria such as teaching ability and research skills. Small wonder that many applicants engage in what Daniel Sargent, a history professor at UC Berkeley, calls “performative dishonesty.”

Margaret Soltan, May 19, 2024 3:06PM
Posted in: just plain gross

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=75899

One Response to “The editorial is typically weaselly, but the fact that DEI statements suck seems to have gotten through even to the Washington Post.”

  1. University Diaries » ‘The allegations stemmed from a conversation that Dawson had on March 23 with two professors as they attended a diversity, equity and student success conference hosted by the American Association of Colleges and Universiti Says:

    […] On DEI and its current inevitable dismantling: Human beings tend to learn by making glaringly obvious mistakes and then backtracking from them. UD doesn’t know why this is. In principle, advanced societies should feature people who anticipate that many procedural paths are in error, and these people would therefore avoid these paths. […]

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories