← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

‘“I don’t think cities are meant to have people living on the street,” [a civil rights attorney] told WTOP. “It would take resources, law enforcement and other personnel to come in and move the people from the encampments and, presumably, put them into some type of shelter, mental health shelters or hospital settings — whatever is appropriate.”’

Under pressure from a hostile regime, DC begins to get going on its homelessness problem. The mayor notes that of course “the encampments are not technically permitted in the District.” And yet the last time UD returned home via Union Station, the waiting area was overwhelmed by homeless people, many sleeping in seats meant for travelers. A woman in one of the seats nastily told me to give her money, and, when I didn’t, followed me into the bathrooms and got nastier. Er – technically – this is not permitted.

Read Nellie Bowles for a bellyful of the ‘progressive-libertarian nihilism’ DC’s headed for.

[A]ny intervention that has to be imposed on a vulnerable person is so fundamentally flawed and problematic that the best thing to do is nothing at all. Anyone offended by the sight of the suffering is just judging someone who’s having a mental-health episode, and any liberal who argues that the state can and should take control of someone in the throes of drugs and psychosis is basically a Republican. If and when the vulnerable person dies, that was his choice, and in San Francisco we congratulate ourselves on being very accepting of that choice...

Margaret Soltan, February 18, 2025 12:08PM
Posted in: snapshots from home

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=78680

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories