Here’s the article in The Hatchet, the George Washington University student newspaper, in which UD – in agreement with other GW professors interviewed for the piece – downplays worries about the effects of texting on university writing.
Soltan said bits of texting language occur only on very rare occasions and in informal settings.
“If it’s an in-class writing assignment and it’s a student that’s writing in a very relaxed, colloquial way, then maybe a student makes a mistake and is kind of embarrassed and might put ‘lol’ in parentheses,” [Soltan] said.
Correction, from the Associated Press:
In a story Aug. 23 about spending in college athletics, The Associated Press, relying on a researcher working for the NCAA, reported erroneously that Florida, Ohio State and Tennessee were among the 14 Football Bowl Subdivision schools that made money from campus athletics in the 2009 fiscal year. The researcher now says athletic expenses exceeded revenue at those three universities, and federal records confirmed it.
… IMG, the world’s largest sports marketing company, has recently acquired Host Communications, International Sports Properties and The Collegiate Licensing Corporation in order the create the most powerful and integrated collegiate sports marketing company in the industry. Colleges can’t generate this revenue from within. They need to partner with, outsource to or accept guarantees from entities like IMG and ESPN in order to maximize revenues. What determines the value of these deals? The answer, plain and simple, is winning. Thus, the immense pressure on athletic directors and head coaches to win conference championships and get to bowl games. When the pressure is this intense, the money this great and the scrutiny this acute, we should expect to see the best and the worst in people …
This is from a rather strange piece in Forbes about the commercialization of university football, and the shocking (to the writer, at least) academic and financial scandal now raging in the North Carolina Chapel Hill sports program. The writer correctly describes, here, the incredible distortions and corruptions attendant on having to win big if you’re going to justify the expense of your program, and maybe even make a profit (almost no universities do). But he describes the functioning of big time athletics programs incorrectly throughout the piece.
He argues, for instance, that all programs go to great lengths to hold down costs.
You need only revisit the recent private plane scandal at the University of Kansas, or consider how universities compensate coaches these days, to shoot that one down. How many schools have bought totally unnecessary, insanely expensive Adzillatrons for their stadiums? How many schools spend millions and millions of dollars every year in litigation with coaches and players any idiot could have seen were going to be trouble?
No – see – it’s like this. Bunch of cowboys ridin’ the bomb.
It’s a lucky capitalist who owns the means of promotion.
Thomas Zdeblick, a perennial UD subject, is undeniably a brilliant inventor of spinal devices. But newspapers keep writing about him because even as he promotes his discoveries, he has profound and potentially compromising financial interests in them.
There’s nothing wrong with making money off of your patents.
There’s something wrong with using your industry connections and your editorial power to rush your stuff into use before we know much about its safety.
University Diaries will let others take on the corrupt pill and medical device industry in this country. Her concern is with universities, and the way conflicted professors and compromised research undermine academic institutions.
There will always be some bad results for people who take certain new pills or experience certain new devices. But there’s been a sort of institutionalization of bad results lately, many of them happening at university research centers. Powerful professors with strong industry ties, rampant off-label use, control of editorial boards, and of course hapless universities, have conspired to hurt us, and to hurt universities.
Here’s one small suggestion for reform: Take a look at Zdeblick’s faculty page at the University of Wisconsin. From our point of view — yours and mine — the most important thing about him – his remarkable relationship to Medtronic (22 million dollars from them in the last eight years) – does not appear. It should.
Jonathan Yardley, Washington Post:
The salaries paid to professional athletes became so inflated [starting in the 'eighties] that it’s difficult to see how ordinary fans managed to identify with them, but somehow they did. Far worse was the descent of big-time college athletics into a cesspool of greed and exploitation.
… “Is this a misprint or what?” [Former University of Kentucky All-American Frank Ramsey] said when he saw that the K Fund donation required to reserve his second-row [Kentucky basketball] seats would leap from $1,350 to $5,000 per ticket.
… [He] decided not to renew his tickets near the floor.
… “I agree the university has the right to price their tickets,” he said. “I’m sure they’ve done a lot of research on it before raising the prices 300 percent.”
Actually, the increase in required K Fund donation for the first four rows represents a 370 percent markup.
… “(Paying) $10,000 just for the right to buy two tickets in Lexington, Ky., with this economy the way it is statewide — just seems they would have to have something to back it up…”
*******************
Lexington Herald-Leader
… and asks Tom Wolfe to step in.
It seems to her that only the author of Bonfire of the Vanities can capture the current reality of America’s most hilariously crime-beshat campus, the University of Miami.
Things at UM have gotten Rabelaisian. Dickensian. But both of those writers are dead. Only Wolfe, among the living, can convey everything UM, from the mercenary madness of its science labs to the bitter jihads of its jailed boosters…
Yes, Nevin Shapiro, who, until his Ponzi scheme collapsed, hung out with the team and endowed athletic buildings, has announced from his cell that he’s written a draft of a shocking exposé unmasking fifteen billion NCAA violations.
And just when the football team was beginning to recover from bad publicity over its onfield riots!
The Wall Street Journal reviews a new anthology of parodies. Here’s a nice one, a take on Sumer Is Icumen In:
Plumber is icumen in;
Bludie big tu-du.
Bloweth lampe and showeth dampe.
And dripth the wud thru.
Bludie hel, boo-hoo!
… expect a new category of university stories: Physicians at teaching hospitals arrested for various “pill mill” schemes.
Pill mills have so far mainly operated out of storefronts, and have been run by doctors without a university affiliation. But as states begin to crack down on these easily-identified businesses, expect more stories like this one, from Jersey Shore University Medical Center.
My definition of an intellectual is someone who can listen to the William Tell Overture without thinking of the Lone Ranger.
It’s not clear, from Googling around, who originated this line, but I thought I’d use it to begin a kind of Part Two of my post the other day about the nature of a serious university education.
UD can’t listen to the Overture without thinking of a 1960 tv ad for Lark cigarettes. Have a Lark have a Lark have a Lark Lark Lark…
*****************************
In an opinion piece titled “The Slow Death of the Intellect,” Jonathan Jansen, a South African professor, laments the absence of an intellectual culture at his country’s universities. He describes such a culture as featuring
critical activities (film, drama, seminars, special lectures, open debates, musical performance, architectural display, critical dialogues, scholarly book launches, thoughtful protests — more about this later — and speakers) that together act to encourage, excite and evoke thoughtful discussion and deliberation.
An intellectual culture in this sense is a felt experience, not localised events in isolated parts of that campus. It is not busyness but quality activities that breed curiosity, creativity and dissent.
“Felt experience” is I think the most important part of this — all of the critical activities share a certain characteristic seriousness and energy; they act together, as Jansen says, to provoke people’s curiosity about the world, to draw them into disciplined thought and discussion, and thus to create an environment of collective reflection.
You could think of it by invoking a couple of other statements about intellectuality, the first from Oliver Wendell Holmes:
The main part of intellectual education is not the acquisition of facts but learning how to make facts live.
And the second from Jacob Bronowski:
To me, being an intellectual doesn’t mean knowing about intellectual issues; it means taking pleasure in them.
Making them live; taking pleasure in them; this is the felt experience Jansen’s getting at: A real university campus feels different from any other place because everywhere there’s a seductive, perceptible, pensive buzz. All around you, people are being changed by new thought, led forth, as the word educate has it, from wherever they were before they entered university culture.
Jensen notes the irony that apartheid, and the galvanizing, widely shared moral debate it generated, turns out in an odd sense to have been good for universities. Now, “with the anti-apartheid motif gone, there is no longer a higher appeal to organise, mobilise and cement intellectual cultures on campuses anywhere.” In its place, “creeping managerialism [has] turned the scholarship of teaching and inquiry into a parade of ‘measurable units’ used by university bureaucracies to satisfy the constant demands for numerical accountability.” Bad presidents, “ignorant of the purposes of the university and the threats to it,” have also done their bit.
Jansen goes on to propose reasonable and unsurprising changes — a new, rigorous liberal arts curriculum; a critical mass, on each campus, of intellectually serious professors who would organize seminars and invite speakers and do other things to energize moribund schools… But he knows the task is daunting, that “building cultures is not the same thing as changing a curriculum or erecting a new lecture hall.”
Indeed, “intellectual culture” will always be a rather inchoate idea; but we know of its intense attractiveness to people: Students at Harvard and Princeton routinely complain of its lack on their campuses, and they’re at two of the best universities in the world.
Clearly we’ve all got in mind here some sort of ideal, an entire way of life, a deep and rich existence, in which our minds and bodies and hearts and souls are constantly and delightedly roused by the pleasure of transformative thought.
UD thinks the heart of this ideal involves our conviction that when we’re thinking most excitedly and authentically, we’re actually feeling what it feels like to be free.
Come again?
Liberty, according to my metaphysics is a self-determining power in an intellectual agent. It implies thought and choice and power.
John Adams seems to point here to the connection between the intensest moments of free inquiry in our lives (these moments take place for most of us during college) and the felt experience of personal and political freedom itself. At the heart of intellectual culture is the radically free exercise of the human mind. It is hard to think of a more seductive prospect.