Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
September 16th, 2011 at 10:13AM
Interesting. Perhaps over time they do provide a good measure. I don’t claim to be excellent, but my student ratings (done at the university) so far are fairly high. However, I only have three reviews on RMP, and they’re all extremely negative.
But then, I’ve only been teaching full time for a year, so we’ll see what my RMP reviews are like after three or four years (and actually, despite the reviews being negative, I did modify my teaching this year somewhat, figuring that I should use negative reviews as an opportunity to improve, rather than just ignore them as disgruntled students).
September 16th, 2011 at 11:45AM
RMP is a good source of information…if you have at least 14 RMP evaluations, and it’s a much better source for identifying good teachers than for identifying bad teachers, according to the articles.
September 16th, 2011 at 1:35PM
Most academics seem to feel that the formal teacher evaluations that universities conduct by surveying students are not very reliable, and indeed that they systematically over-rate easy graders and profs who don’t require much work. Which makes intuitive sense.
Why would the RateMyProfs data not suffer from similar problems?
September 17th, 2011 at 1:40AM
@David Foster
Why is RMP in some manner different than course evals done at the universities themselves?
The students who rate profs on RMP actually had to be motivated enough to go to the site and input some data. Based on that, one surmises that these students feel they have something of value to contribute, the ratings are the the way that useful info is communicated to others.
University administered course evals are passed out to nearly every student (which is usually at the end of the course – ie exam review time – or at the exam itself). It’s just another one of life’s meaningless chores to those students and they fill out the form in a disinterested manner, whatever they put down doesn’t reflect reality b/c they don’t care, it’s just useless data. In a single moment they come up w/ the rating and that’s how much of it ends up being simplistic in nature. The though process of “class was easy, so probably this deserves a decent rating” is a simplistic and lazy one, exactly the kind of thing people do when told to do something they have no interest in, it gets the chore out of the way.
September 17th, 2011 at 9:13AM
Mike S.: On in-class evaluations: I totally agree. Many departments — amazingly — continue to stand by them, even as superior electronic systems are widely available.
Another thing about the in-class evaluations that makes them even less likely to be taken seriously — they typically ask TONS of questions, as opposed to the lean, mean RMP- type systems. And since often each department fashions its own form, there’s a real quality-control problem.
September 17th, 2011 at 11:50AM
My institution has moved to an entirely online evaluation system – no more in class evaluations. The response rate (so far) is around 1/3 it was when they were handed out in class. That may change, but it does mean the students who comment have stronger feelings.
My own subjective experience indicates that negative feelings tend to be more of a prompt than positive ones, but we shall see how it works in the long run. Overall, my online evaluations weren’t much different than the in-class ones – we just had fewer of them.
September 17th, 2011 at 12:52PM
Conservative English PhD: Response rate is certainly an issue.
The studies I’ve seen seem to suggest that positive as well as negative feelings are prompts for filling these things out.
But you point to another reason I like the online system – it’s absurd to force students to fill these out by taking up class time and making a big deal out of it. People have a right to opt out of rating their professors. Some schools provide incentives of various kinds, which is fine. But making it mandatory just invites lots of meaningless results.