← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

No exit

It’s like saying, ‘I don’t like Pollock because he splattered paint,’” said Nina Rappaport, chairwoman of Docomomo-New York/Tri-State, an organization that promotes the preservation of Modernist architecture. “Does that mean we shouldn’t put it in a museum? No, it means we teach people about these things.”

Actually, disliking a local Brutalist building and wanting it demolished – see this New York Times article about townspeople in upstate New York interested in getting rid of a Paul Rudolph thing – is nothing like that. When you’re in the mood, you visit a Pollack painting in a museum. You don’t live or work in a Pollack painting. You don’t look at it every day whether you want to or not.

You don’t get to say I’m thrilled to have a job working for the city of Boston, but I’m going to work in a building I prefer.

It’s been a lifelong dream of mine to work for the FBI, but I’ll be moving into a space in the Old Post Office, thanks.

No, people feel strongly about architecture because it’s ubiquitous, inescapable, having profound quotidian impact.

Nina Rappaport can teach ’til she’s blue in the facade, but it turns out that no one likes to be brutalized.

Margaret Soltan, April 7, 2012 5:22PM
Posted in: democracy

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=35495

8 Responses to “No exit”

  1. dave.s. Says:

    Prince Charles! He’s my guy! I worked across the plaza from the brutalist Boston City Hall. Butt ugly, energy inefficient, nasty spaces. If people want to photograph these buildings for posterity, okay, but the wrecking ball can’t come too soon.

    And I’m betting that, once enshrined on the intertubes for a grateful posterity, photo sites for most of these buildings will get maybe three visits a day.

  2. MattF Says:

    As I recall, the Art & Architecture students at Yale tried to burn down their Rudoph-designed building. Which turned into an inside joke in the architecture world, since you’d think that architecture students would know that concrete doesn’t burn.

  3. Mr Punch Says:

    The reason the brutalist buildings are in trouble is not that they’re ugly (although they are, especially in grey damp climates – it’s no accident Rudolph’s best stuff is in Florida). The problem is that they’re unadaptable, to the point that it’s impossible to change the wiring, even to move a light switch. It was Corbu himself who called a house a machine for living; this is the test this style has failed.

  4. theprofessor Says:

    We have our own Brutalist building. Fortunately, it is slowly subsiding on one end, and it appears that nothing (affordable, anyway) can save it. The thought is that in 10-15 years, it will become structurally unsound and have to be demolished.

  5. DM Says:

    A new building was erected in the 2000s at the École normale supérieure, to replace some smaller (and not too well-built) structure. The architect wanted bare concrete for artistic reasons, even though the building includes dormitories, and a library (unpainted concrete releases a powder that’s detrimental to books). I’ve had meetings in the lower floors, walking inside corridors gives a clear impression of playing a real-life DOOM game (you know, darkish corridors, neons, and expecting to have monsters behind the corner).

    Later, I found a reduced scale replica of this building in an architecture museum: apparently, it was praised by other architects.

    That’s one example of what I perceive as a disconnection between what many architects think of they should do, and what the rest of society would like them to. They think they should create original works of art; the rest of us, who have to live and/or work in their buildings, would like something convenient and pleasant.

  6. Margaret Soltan Says:

    DM: Nice example of the problem. France has more than its share of depressing new – or newish – buildings.

  7. DM Says:

    @Margaret Soltan: I think it’s related to 1) architecture being taught as an art, as opposed to a craft or an engineering discipline 2) arrogant dismissal of criticism as philistinism 3) designs for public buildings being chosen without input from the real stakeholders (that is, not the big brass who will go to the inauguration, but people who will work in them).

  8. University Diaries » Tricks of the Writing Trade: How a Strong Writer Defends the Indefensible. Says:

    […] “It’s like saying, ‘I don’t like Pollock because he splattered paint,’” said Nina Rappaport, chairwoman of Docomomo-New York/Tri-State, an organization that promotes the preservation of Modernist architecture. “Does that mean we shouldn’t put it in a museum? No, it means we teach people about these things.” […]

Comment on this Entry

UD REVIEWED

Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times

George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil

It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo

There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub

You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann

Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog

University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog

[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal

Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education

[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University

Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University

The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog

Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages

Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway

From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law

University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association

The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog

I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes

As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls

Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical

University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life

[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada

If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte

Archives

Categories