← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

‘Privately, several people connected with the academy have questioned if unflattering attention to Ms. Berlowitz’s pay might prove awkward, given that the report is, as Mr. Rowe put it, “a full-throated plea for more public and private funding.” According to filings with the Internal Revenue Service, Ms. Berlowitz received compensation totaling more than $598,000 for the fiscal year ending in March 2012 for leading the academy’s staff of several dozen — far more than the leaders of most similar scholarly societies, and more than many college presidents.’

It’s the hydra-head problem again. When the head of the group that assembled the upcoming report on the impoverished state of the humanities in America is herself way over-compensated (plus – reportedly – the daily user of a chauffeured limo) it makes it easy for enemies of funding to say Hey well humanists seem to be doing right well for themselves. When the person responsible for the report is alleged to have been an inhumane boss, it makes it easy for enemies of funding to ask In what way do the humanities as presently carried out make you more humane?

The problem has things in common with university presidents who have chauffeured limos and private jets and first-class travel – American University’s Benjamin Ladner being the highest profile example of this in the last few years. The problem is also related to university presidents who use up a good deal of their time and make hundreds of thousands of extra dollars sitting on the boards of places like Goldman Sachs; shady hedge fund guys on boards of trustees; and schools with multi-billion-dollar endowments. It’s just hard to keep aloft the Beautiful Suffering Misunderstood Humanities banner when high-profile people very publicly making the case for them are making out like bandits.

It’s a very similar hypocrisy to the over-compensated law professor at the public interest law school.

Everyone gets hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is one of the easiest things to understand.

Margaret Soltan, June 12, 2013 6:39AM
Posted in: hoax

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=40251

2 Responses to “‘Privately, several people connected with the academy have questioned if unflattering attention to Ms. Berlowitz’s pay might prove awkward, given that the report is, as Mr. Rowe put it, “a full-throated plea for more public and private funding.” According to filings with the Internal Revenue Service, Ms. Berlowitz received compensation totaling more than $598,000 for the fiscal year ending in March 2012 for leading the academy’s staff of several dozen — far more than the leaders of most similar scholarly societies, and more than many college presidents.’”

  1. MattF Says:

    It’s true that Ladner won the salary sweepstakes, but there were others:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/education/22sidestevens.html?ref=peterdiamandopoulos

    The correction at the end of the article is a classic, btw.

  2. Margaret Soltan Says:

    MattF: NOT forced to resign after students rioted. LOL. You’re right. A classic.

Comment on this Entry

Latest UD posts at IHE

Archives

Categories