I don’t think the now-notorious UVa gang rape story, as told to Rolling Stone magazine, is a hoax.
But, as I commented to one of my readers who thinks it might be, this blog has covered false rape claims before, and if this turns out to be one, it will certainly do that again.
And of course this blog will cover emergent skeptical takes on the Rolling Stone account. Like this one.
Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=46647
Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
December 3rd, 2014 at 9:32AM
The story, as related in Rolling Stone, simply does not make sense. Besides what I mentioned before, if the room was “pitch black,” how does she remember the frat boys “swigging beer”? How does she recognize the guy from her anthro discussion section? How can her date, “Drew” and the other guy possibly be giving “instruction and encouragement” (especially instruction) in a pitch black room? How do they even know that anthro discussion boy can’t get it up? Why do even drunken and stoned frat boys not bother to turn on the lights to clean up the broken glass so they won’t be cut themselves? Do frat boys in the Year of Our Lord 2012 really call themselves “Blanket” and “Armpit”? How difficult, by the way, would it have been for a reporter to track down “Drew” and presumably Mr. “Blanket” and Mr. “Armpit”?
“Jackie had taken three hours getting ready, straightening her long, dark, wavy hair. She’d congratulated herself on her choice of a tasteful red dress with a high neckline. Now, climbing the frat-house stairs with Drew, Jackie felt excited. Drew ushered Jackie into a bedroom, shutting the door behind them.”
OK, we have established with an almost painfully explicit description that “Jackie” is not one of those stereotypical, scantily-clad floozies. Her dress is “tasteful” and “high-necked”–she is the image of prim and proper. Yet, on entering the frat house she immediately heads upstairs with Drew to a bedroom. Make sense?
I don’t know whether the reported assault is a hoax or not, UD, but at this point, I am about 100% certain that it could not possibly have happened the way the story describes it. Moreover, short of “Drew,” “anthro discussion boy,” Mr. “Blanket,” or Mr. “Armpit” having an attack of conscience and confessing, there is really no way of being sure.
December 3rd, 2014 at 10:18AM
tp: As I understand it, most rape accounts are reasonably reliable. Jackie’s is probably reasonably reliable. As this story plays out, we will find out to what extent her account can be trusted.
December 3rd, 2014 at 12:05PM
The apologists for the “Dear Colleague” letter have repeatedly claimed that universities’ judicial proceedings are completely separate from those of the criminal courts and that the constitutional protections afforded to American citizens in the courts do not apply in university proceedings. OK. Let’s get serious, then. There must be many individuals still on campus who were at that party. The names of the house residents must clearly be known to the administration in any event. “Drew” should be easy to identify, along with “Blanket,” “Armpit,” anthro discussion boy, and the three friends that she called. Haul every one of them in front of a panel and ask them what they saw and heard that night. Make their continued enrollment conditional upon testifying. Surely someone at a party going full-blast at 3 AM noticed a distraught and bloody woman exiting the building. If their parents complain, refer them them to Erik Holder and Barack Obama, who will surely defend this procedure. If “Jackie’s” account is true, UVA knowingly allowed and may still be allowing seven near-psychopaths to run amok when they should be in prison doing hard time. You would think that a premier university with a woman as a president would take the strongest measures to protect the campus’ women. The limp response of the UVA administration and its point person, a female dean no less, suggests either that they themselves are totally unfit or that they had their own doubts.
I was also interested in whether these gang rapists had a noticeable impact on local crime, since given their behavior, “Jackie” would not have been their only victim. Between 2000 and 2012, Charlottesville authorities had between 17 to 35 rapes per year reported. For 2010-2012, the reported numbers were 29, 27, and 17, respectively. There are about 24,000 women living in Charlottesville, with about 8000 of them being UVA undergraduates. If every reported rape belonged to a UVA undergrad woman, that would mean that 0.2% of them reported a rape to police. If UVA is in fact the rape factory that is being alleged, it seems strange that this number is so low, even given victims’ unwillingness to bring charges. At Gilligan, entering freshmen are compelled to sit through numerous skits and sessions discussing rape, sexual harassment, and violence of all kinds, and with regard to rape, there is a strong message that victims need to bring charges and can expect support. I thought these were standard everywhere. They aren’t at UVA? If not, why not? If yes, they are obviously ineffective. Why aren’t people demanding the resignation of Pres. Sullivan and her rape-enabling administration?
December 5th, 2014 at 2:08PM
Rolling Stone retracts:
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/a-note-to-our-readers-20141205
December 5th, 2014 at 2:21PM
Thanks, Chris. I’ve added the Rolling Stone comment to my latest post.