Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
February 4th, 2016 at 10:13AM
This is a glaring example of malicious and dishonest reporting. Anybody who watched the townhall knows that Hillary did not struggle. She made fun of the ridiculous point that has been made ad nauseam and that is rooted in a sexist belief that women should not be paid – and especially should not be paid a lot – for their work.
But yes, you are absolutely right, sexist reporting like this definitely helps out male candidates on both sides.
February 4th, 2016 at 11:04AM
Clarissa: Women should be paid and paid a lot for their work. Delivering a short speech written by other people is not much work, and should not be highly paid, regardless of gender. When the excessive money comes from a place as corrupt as Goldman Sachs it certainly feels like a quid pro quo.
I’m a Hillary supporter; I think she has a far better chance than Bernie. But if you look at Google News today, which is all over her response to the question, I think it’s pretty clear that this was a misstep. I mean, the speech (and speeches like it) was a misstep, and her answer was a misstep. Rather than saying everyone does it and that’s the market rate, Hillary should step this one back – just as she’s currently stepping back previously scheduled financial sector fundraisers – and acknowledge that it was indeed not well-judged.
February 4th, 2016 at 11:05AM
Clarissa what exactly was the work that she was being paid that kind of money for?
how would one justify such pay from the donor class “Well, I don’t know…”
February 4th, 2016 at 11:08AM
I watched it, too… the issue is not sexism. The issue is that she signed on to the amoral style of Wall Street that holds money is good and more is better, whether there is real value in the transaction or not.
February 4th, 2016 at 11:10AM
Unfortunately, there is real value in the transaction: Campaign money for Hillary, and influence in her White House for Goldman Sachs. Bad optics.
February 4th, 2016 at 11:32AM
We are on the same page, I believe. If there was any value it was unidirectional. Unless we assume a future quid pro quo.
February 4th, 2016 at 11:42AM
BC, I wouldn’t say a quid pro quo as much as mutual common interests, which is the real issue/problem.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/lloyd-blankfein-bernie-sanders-218689
February 4th, 2016 at 12:40PM
Maybe I should have been clearer by saying she signed on to the amoral style of Wall Street that holds money is good and more is better, whether there is redeeming social value in the transaction or not.
February 4th, 2016 at 3:20PM
indeed, likely why they chose NY as their home base.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/27/want-to-reverse-sky-high-inequality-bernie-sanders-is-the-pragmatic-choice?CMP=fb_us
February 4th, 2016 at 7:35PM
I read a well-written piece a while back that Hillary is the major party candidate most acceptable to Corporate America. Can’t recall the source, but I couldn’t quarrel with the cold-blooded reasoning. Established track record, etc. (Trump was viewed in the article as disruptive of even the more reliably corporate Republican candidates.)
February 5th, 2016 at 10:03AM
The idea that Hillary can be corrupted by Wall Street amorality is laughable. That would be a case of a second-semester art student giving painting lessons to Michelangelo. The Clintons are the Michelangelo and Michelangela of amorality.
February 5th, 2016 at 3:36PM
Koch money corrupts Republicans, but Goldman Sachs money doesn’t corrupt Hillary?
February 5th, 2016 at 3:46PM
JND: I’m afraid it does. Obviously.