← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

Sports Illustrated opens the new decade with a LONG article about tanking attendance at college football games.

We’ve been talking about that forever on this blog; but while everyone else sees it as a problem, we see it as intellectual progress.

Margaret Soltan, January 10, 2020 5:04PM
Posted in: sport

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=63022

7 Responses to “Sports Illustrated opens the new decade with a LONG article about tanking attendance at college football games.”

  1. Stephen Karlson Says:

    Gosh, you mean students might be enrolling at the state flagships for the academic rigor, not the game day and party experience? The horror!

    The correspondent didn’t get into the poorer quarters, such as the Mid-American Conference (several teams an easy drive from Columbus, Ohio, including Northern Illinois and several compass point Michigans you’ve remarked on) with its November football on school nights, in order to get ESPN coverage of empty aluminum benches in the stands slowly getting frosty.

  2. Ravi Narasimhan Says:

    I would take a close look at the rise in foreign student enrollment what with their sneaky preparation, drive, and work ethic taking away opportunities from honest American kids who just want to have a rounded college experience.

    The canaries aren’t the profiled schools worrying over “only 86K” in the stands. The rest are in the parking lot supporting the brand and making donations. The small to midsize schools trying to keep up in this bugnuts arms race are the ones in deep trouble.

    There does seem to be a bright future for “Risk managers” and “Communications directors.”

  3. Margaret Soltan Says:

    Ravi: I think the big schools also need to sweat a bit on this one. They’ve made their coaches multimillionaires (and lost far more than that when they’ve fired them, been sued by them, and had to cough up pointless additional millions to multiple spurned coaches), turned the school into a joke/cheating machine, increasingly pissed off their state funders, and, as the article points out (this one on North Dakota State makes the same point), the now totally clear divide between winner and loser football schools (the losers being the ones Stephen mentions) means that people don’t show up for the games because their team always wins. It’s kind of embarrassing/boring/excruciating to watch your team yet again pull ahead by 50 points in the first quarter and go on to eviscerate the opposing team. So these are schools that have dedicated HUGE resources to athletics – money that could have been directed/coaxed to academics – and students aren’t coming to the games.

  4. Ravi Narasimhan Says:

    While I am generally sympathetic to your argument, this specific article focuses on relatively few empty seats in undesirable sections of otherwise full stadiums. So long as the tickets are sold at the football schools – which they seem to be – who cares if people, especially students, come? They will soon electronically fill in the gaps and no one will be the wiser. College football has just become Facebook. The cool kids moved elsewhere once the old people took over.

    Check out

    https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/emt8br/si_why_is_college_football_attendance_tanking/

    for comments from the still faithful – school logo attached to each screenname. They aren’t enamored by the stadium experience any longer. With everything optimized for tv, they’d rather stay home and watch competitive games (plural) on tv while getting inexpensively drunk with friends. These paragons have not only graduated but have reproduced and don’t want to spend huge amounts of money and time taking spouse and babies to games where there’s heat, humidity, airport security (hardest on mothers, of course), insufficient and overpriced food, and lack of toilets. Getting decent seats also means an annual baksheesh to the athletic department on top of ticket and travel costs. The commitment to football is still there in spades and, as the article said, no one is concerned about CTE or the scholastic vitality of the players. I doubt any would blink an eye at the salaries of coaches. There’s just no reason to go to all that effort to watch their team steamroll patsies.

    State funders are much more easily honked off by insufficiently deferential academics. You’ve featured a few of these. Waves of California legislatures have shredded the UC system over the last 40+ years and it had little to do with athletics. Yes, this money could be redirected into academics but with a few exceptions like Stanford, donors want to give only to sports. I am leaving out the Harvards and MITs since their athletics are in a different cost category.

  5. charlie Says:

    What the article doesn’t mention is that university enrollment has been falling every year beginning in 2011.

    http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/nscblog/fall-enrollment-decline-for-eighth-consecutive-year/

    Apparently, the probability that growing numbers of teenagers would eventually realize that tuition is too damn high never was a consideration for uni bright lights. Keep in mind, nearly all P5 unis use the business model that a prominent football team will increase enrollment, no matter the price of attendance. Admins and BOTs had eight years of data showing the opposite. Either they’re idiots, or they don’t work for students, or the public. You decide…

  6. Stephen Karlson Says:

    Charlie, that business model might not deliver what the administrators want. A few years ago Northern Illinois (I retired from there five years ago) went to the Orange Bowl. Yes, applications increased in the immediate aftermath, but those applicants were weaker than the matriculants prior to the football accomplishment, such as it was.

  7. charlie Says:

    Stephen, your post sparked a memory of admin justification for going into debt for amenities building. According to those functionaries, if potential admits don’t have climbing walls, spas, granite counter tops, and sushi availability, they ain’t showing up. Questions asked should be why in hell are you pandering to a spoiled, entitled bunch of teenagers? What will those brats bring to classroom? Since when should the public subsidize a four to six year stay at a resort/day care for young adults?

Comment on this Entry

UD REVIEWED

Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times

George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil

It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo

There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub

You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann

Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog

University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog

[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal

Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education

[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University

Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University

The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog

Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages

Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway

From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law

University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association

The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog

I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes

As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls

Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical

University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life

[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada

If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte

Archives

Categories