← Previous Post: | Next Post:

 

“There was a Vivian Gornick interview in Bookforum recently in which she was asked about some of the mid-century American writers that were considered great. She said she doesn’t ‘know one young person who reads Roth, or Bellow, or Mailer — not one young woman anyway.'”

And Philip Roth’s biographer responds to his interviewer’s quotation from Gornick in exactly the right way:

I think that says more about Vivian Gornick’s social circle than it does about women collectively.

I mean. Jesus. Let’s keep ’em away from Henry Miller, James Joyce, Hemingway, and Don DeLillo too. Wouldn’t want to expose them to great fiction!

And let’s hope Hadley Freeman’s social circle is a lot larger than Gornick’s.

[E]njoying a novel is not dependent on approving of the deliberately flawed characters, or its similarly imperfect author. There are many things that make a book good – elegant writing, emotional truth, narrative voice – besides its morality.

And of course there are plenty of great novels – Lolita, Notes from Underground, Journey to the End of the Night – whose immorality intrigues us.

Margaret Soltan, April 2, 2021 5:29PM
Posted in: just plain gross

Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=66729

4 Responses to ““There was a Vivian Gornick interview in Bookforum recently in which she was asked about some of the mid-century American writers that were considered great. She said she doesn’t ‘know one young person who reads Roth, or Bellow, or Mailer — not one young woman anyway.'””

  1. University Diaries » Paul Theroux on the Truth of Art. Says:

    […] post continues the theme in this one, where a propagandist is quoted glorying in the fact that (as she tells it) many young women today […]

  2. JKW Says:

    Oh god, not Vivian Gornick again. I say again because when I was a wee lad in the graduate program in English at Columbia, a chapter from one of Gornick’s memoir-ish books was a reading for the composition course we were all compelled to teach. It was a senseless, meandering piece about wandering around New York on foot; the style of it suited the subject matter, in that sense. I still think, often, with irritation, about that piece of writing. Since I do often think of it, though, I suppose that suggests that it has some power, even if that power is an irritant.

  3. Margaret Soltan Says:

    JKW: Most English profs compelled to teach from a set reading list know the special hell of trying to say something good, or at least intellectually valuable, about second-rate stuff. It’s not quite as bad as having to gather each day at The Dear Leader’s statue and thank him on your knees for his miraculous leadership of the Progressive Korean Peoples, but it’s definitely humiliating and insanely inauthentic.

    Not that all set reading lists are bad. St John’s College has figured out how to make reading lists instructors respect.

  4. JKW Says:

    Believe it or not, the Gornick piece was far from the worst offering. We were allowed to choose half of about thirty readings, many (but not all) of which were much, much shittier than the Gornick article. Only one or two, by Joan Didion and Mark Edmunson, stand out as having been good. But that left another ten or so assignments that demanded readings, and there was a bank of a dozen or so mediocrities–as opposed to atrocities–from which to choose. The atrocities, ten or so, were so awful and unintelligible that they would have made the course unteachable.

    Another article I had to teach, at least somewhat intelligible one, was by André Aciman, who is inoffensive and even somewhat charming in person, but whose prose makes me want to vomit. That piece was so ridiculous that when I had to write a “lesson plan” as part of the dreaded Teaching Practicum all graduate students had to endure I made up the silliest lesson I could conceive of. (Perhaps needless to say, this course was pass/fail.) I included something called a “fishbowl exercise” and even incorporated a field trip into my lesson. The field trip struck me as maybe too much, and for a moment I feared that perhaps my higher-ups would realize that I was not taking their course as seriously as they repeatedly demanded. But I need not have feared. I was told that the lesson plan was fantastic, phenomenal, really great, and I passed the course with ease.

    And yet some set reading lists, as you say, are perfectly respectable. The set list for the actual literature course that all Columbia freshmen take, Literature Humanities, is a real joy to read and to teach. Alas, the composition course, which is crappy enough on its own, suffers greatly and inevitably by comparison.

Comment on this Entry

UD REVIEWED

Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times

George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil

It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo

There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub

You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann

Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog

University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog

[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal

Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education

[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University

Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University

The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog

Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages

Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway

From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law

University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association

The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog

I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes

As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls

Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical

University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life

[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada

If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte

Archives

Categories