… What kinds of courses do they offer? Robbing Widows and Orphans? Grinding the Faces of the Poor? Having It Both Ways? Feeding at the Public Trough?”
William Deresiewicz, New York Times
… What kinds of courses do they offer? Robbing Widows and Orphans? Grinding the Faces of the Poor? Having It Both Ways? Feeding at the Public Trough?”
William Deresiewicz, New York Times
Trackback URL for this post:
https://www.margaretsoltan.com/wp-trackback.php?p=35860
Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
May 14th, 2012 at 7:41AM
i) If all it took to force a change of course were public statements of the obvious, the world would be a very different place.
ii) Deresiewicz’ piece irks me greatly. It is not necessary, or even helpful, to invoke psychopathy to make the points he wants to make.
We should be taking on these matters by talking about things like ‘material misrepresentation’; lying about the important facts of one’s business venture is easily understood, almost universally condemned and illegal.
Whether the perps. can empathize, can be successfully treated for their lack of empathy, or whether the condition of ‘psychopathy/sociopathy’ even can be shown ‘objectively’ to exist are much less important.
May 14th, 2012 at 7:56AM
and I am amused by Mr. Deresiewicz.
May 14th, 2012 at 8:01AM
further: following the Chronicle rule in the firing of Riley, the Times should be chastised for publishing a piece that condescends to business schools without bothering to look at the curriculum. Don’t hold your breath, though, waiting for academics to get all outraged at the voicing of an opinion without adequate “research”.
May 14th, 2012 at 8:11AM
Hey, an English professor who writes for The Nation doesn’t like capitalism! Hard-hitting stuff from the NYT.
May 14th, 2012 at 9:41AM
Having been turfed from Yale for lack of scholarship, Deresiewicz is trying to work his way into the salons of the rich and powerful with the usual tantrums. Please don’t get in the way of politifessor clambering up the social ladder or chasing after bucks dispensed by foundations established by the biz types he excoriates.
May 14th, 2012 at 9:49AM
So what is the percentage of psychopaths, according to the same measurement criteria, to be found among politicians and senior government officials?
To the extent there is any intellectual coherence in the linked article at all, he seems to be saying that corporations, as artificial persons, are *inherently* wicked or at least amoral. Why would’t the same be true of governments and their agencies, which have a very similar form of artificial personhood?
I responded to a similar unhinged attack on businesspeople as a class, by WashPost writer Richard Cohen here.
May 14th, 2012 at 10:02AM
UD, I assumed you called attention to this piece to show us how out of touch the professor and the NYTimes are, right?
May 14th, 2012 at 10:06AM
http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/jul2009/bs20090713_635092.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-warner/blame-the-business-school_b_138015.html
May 14th, 2012 at 10:27AM
I do believe that “analytical dogmatism,” as the BW article calls it, has contributed to the current problems; this is a different and more sophisticated critique than is the Deresiewicz rant. Excessive reliance on theoretical models can be damaging even when the models are not being employed by profit-seeking businesspeople but by truly selfless public servants (assuming for the moment the existence of such creatures) motivated entirely by altruism.
Abstract analytics are required in complex organizations and economies, but they can easily lead to kidding oneself and others. As I’ve observed before: large blocks of bad loans were made by PhDs with IQs of 140, in cooperation with MBAs with IQs of 130, which would not have been approved on an individual basis by old-line loan officers with IQs of 110.