Dr. Bernard Carroll, known as the "conscience of psychiatry," contributed to various blogs, including Margaret Soltan's University Diaries, for which he sometimes wrote limericks under the name Adam.
New York Times
George Washington University English professor Margaret Soltan writes a blog called University Diaries, in which she decries the Twilight Zone-ish state our holy land’s institutes of higher ed find themselves in these days.
The Electron Pencil
It’s [UD's] intellectual honesty that makes her blog required reading.
Professor Mondo
There's always something delightful and thought intriguing to be found at Margaret Soltan's no-holds-barred, firebrand tinged blog about university life.
AcademicPub
You can get your RDA of academic liars, cheats, and greedy frauds at University Diaries. All disciplines, plus athletics.
truffula, commenting at Historiann
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries blogs superbly and tirelessly about [university sports] corruption.
Dagblog
University Diaries. Hosted by Margaret Soltan, professor of English at George Washington University. Boy is she pissed — mostly about athletics and funding, the usual scandals — but also about distance learning and diploma mills. She likes poems too. And she sings.
Dissent: The Blog
[UD belittles] Mrs. Palin's degree in communications from the University of Idaho...
The Wall Street Journal
Professor Margaret Soltan, blogging at University Diaries... provide[s] an important voice that challenges the status quo.
Lee Skallerup Bessette, Inside Higher Education
[University Diaries offers] the kind of attention to detail in the use of language that makes reading worthwhile.
Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard University
Margaret Soltan's ire is a national treasure.
Roland Greene, Stanford University
The irrepressibly to-the-point Margaret Soltan...
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Margaret Soltan, whose blog lords it over the rest of ours like a benevolent tyrant...
Perplexed with Narrow Passages
Margaret Soltan is no fan of college sports and her diatribes on the subject can be condescending and annoying. But she makes a good point here...
Outside the Beltway
From Margaret Soltan's excellent coverage of the Bernard Madoff scandal comes this tip...
Money Law
University Diaries offers a long-running, focused, and extremely effective critique of the university as we know it.
Anthony Grafton, American Historical Association
The inimitable Margaret Soltan is, as usual, worth reading. ...
Medical Humanities Blog
I awake this morning to find that the excellent Margaret Soltan has linked here and thereby singlehandedly given [this blog] its heaviest traffic...
Ducks and Drakes
As Margaret Soltan, one of the best academic bloggers, points out, pressure is mounting ...
The Bitch Girls
Many of us bloggers worry that we don’t post enough to keep people’s interest: Margaret Soltan posts every day, and I more or less thought she was the gold standard.
Tenured Radical
University Diaries by Margaret Soltan is one of the best windows onto US university life that I know.
Mary Beard, A Don's Life
[University Diaries offers] a broad sense of what's going on in education today, framed by a passionate and knowledgeable reporter.
More magazine, Canada
If deity were an elected office, I would quit my job to get her on the ballot.
Notes of a Neophyte
September 9th, 2014 at 10:29AM
Yes, SOS, they are good sentences, but wouldn’t the first one be stronger if it ended with “prestidigitates”?
September 9th, 2014 at 10:55AM
Dennis: Interesting – I disliked only “prestidigitates” in Pinker’s sentences! So I would have chosen a different word altogether. But yes – you’re right – out of thin air is totally unnecessary.
September 9th, 2014 at 11:56AM
In a sentence meant to be entirely serious, “conjures” would be better. But I think the author, for humor’s sake, invokes the image of a bafoon-magician.
On the merits — not the SOSM point I know — there is a lot to recommend serious students at state schools. My wife’s experience on the Hill over thirty years favored these students over those from the Ivies, though, of course, not in every case. And this is not a matter of her prefering own profile. Obviously this is anecdotal and there are lot’s of statistical-selection explanations other than that such students are superior across the board.
September 9th, 2014 at 12:31PM
I attended a near-Ivy for college, an Ivy professional school, and a large branch of a good state school for graduate work, and taught in a decent R1 state school for decades. A diligent student can get an excellent education at almost any type of school by seeking out the best professors in the most demanding subjects, but that’s much easier to do in a better school: there are more excellent professors and demanding subjects and there’s less room to hide. Much the same is true of fellow students: there are some excellent ones everywhere but they’re plentiful at elite schools and scarce at weak ones.
As to hiring, I wouldn’t hire anyone without knowing much more about the individual than about the school, but if one were to play the odds, the chances of finding a brilliant student with proven self-discipline are certainly greater at elite schools. Deresiewicz’s anti-Ivy rant is over the top and remarkably evidence-free. He could have made his good points without resorting to rhetorical overdrive, but then he wouldn’t have gotten as much attention.
September 9th, 2014 at 12:58PM
You can have OUR Sports Management major when you pry it out of the cold, stiff fingers of the scholarship athletes who are overwhelmingly its customers and the faculty and administrative jock-sniffers who created it for them.
September 9th, 2014 at 2:21PM
But the **raw number** of “interesting, curious, open, etc” students at non-Ivies is surely much greater than the number of such students at Ivies, just given the distribution of total attendance. And excessive focus on Ivy degrees, across a wide range of professions, surely leads to a waste of human potential on a considerable scale.
I may have quoted this before at this site, but here’s something Peter Drucker wrote back in 1969:
“That so much of American education before Sputnik (and still today, I am afraid) was content with mediocrity and rather smug about it, is a real weakness of our knowledge base. By contrast, one strength of American education is the resistance to any elite monopoly. To be sure, we have institutions that enjoy (deservedly or not) high standing and prestige. But we do not, fortunately, discriminate against the men who receive their training elsewhere. The engineer whose degree is from North Idaho A and M does not regard himself as “inferior” or as “not really an engineer”…The Harvard Law School might like to be a Grande Ecole and to claim for its graduates a preferential position. But American society has never been willing to accept this claim.”
and
“It is almost impossible to explain to a European that the strength of American higher education lies in this absence of schools for leaders and schools for followers. It is almost impossible to explain to a European that the engineer with a degree from North Idaho A and M is an engineer and not a draftsman. Yet this is the flexibility that Europe needs in order to overcome the brain drain and to close the technology gap…the European who knows himself competent because he is not accepted as such–because he is not an “Oxbridge” man or because he did not graduate from one of the Grandes Ecoles and become an Inspecteur de Finance in the government service–will continue to emigrate where he will be used according to what he can do rather than according to what he has not done.”
The acceptance of Harvard Law School (for example) as Grande Ecole with a lock on preferential positions for its graduates has progressed far beyond what was the case when Drucker wrote the above.
September 9th, 2014 at 3:25PM
Oops. Please read “buffoon” (or if you must “bassoon” or bar room), for “bafoon” in my post above.
The post hoc fallacy suggests my proofreading is even worse after a root canal.
September 9th, 2014 at 4:10PM
tp (above) is dead on.
September 9th, 2014 at 7:42PM
Scanned Pinker; have yet to read Deresiewicz. Thanks to all for your comments.
Around 2001 I attended my first state of the university address at my local Podunk Tech. I had little idea what to expect, but something like Pinker on the “goals of university education” and “habits of rationality” would, I guess, have fit the bill.
Nope, that didn’t happen. What I heard was stuff about pumping up enrollment with high-tuition foreign students, sop talk about diversity and stakeholders, etc.
September 10th, 2014 at 6:33AM
Wasn’t Senator Blutarski a Dartmouth alum?
September 10th, 2014 at 6:42AM
Michael: I believe you’re right.